Radical Agenda S05E054 – On Cops

White Nationalists, by necessity, operate with a certain well earned skepticism toward law enforcement, to say the least of it. Our enemies exert a great deal of influence over the political organs, and have an even more frightening grip on the court systems. By extension, this pervasive contamination necessarily impacts law enforcement, putting us at odds entirely too often.

Simultaneously, it becomes obvious to the careful observer that our enemies despise law enforcement personnel, even more than we fear them. Democrat Presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren famously said that our criminal justice system is racist “from front to back”. Border enforcement officers, though 51% Hispanic, have been relentlessly subjected to accusations of running Nazi-esque concentration camps, and myriad other hysterical claims of racially motivated malice. On August 12th 2018, Antifa communists celebrated the anniversary of their riot in Charlottesville, by carrying a giant banner that read “Last year they came with torches, this year they come with badges”.

The Left associates law enforcement with “White Supremacy” for reasons which are not immediately obvious to the casual observer, but make a great deal more sense once one clears the fog of Jewish deception aimed at each.

They attempt to paint the picture as though law enforcement were just out hunting for melanin content trophies, similarly to how one counts the points of deer antlers. This is ridiculous, and so law enforcement personnel are understandably anxious to distance themselves from us, because we are painted with a similar brush. Since we lack the power or platform to respond, they internalize this lie along with the rest of the population.

In reality, the sort of ordered liberty, characteristic of Western Civilization, is the target of Leftist enmity. Our efforts to preserve this way of life, however lawfully or peacefully, are relentlessly targeted with violence, deception, and most notably, lawfare. Law enforcement personnel, though beholden to more easily corrupted institutions, largely enter the profession with similar intent, and thus are met with similar tactics.

In this, we are natural allies, set in opposition to one another by our mutual enemies.

Yet it is precisely those same enemies who open up the opportunity for warmer relations between us, and the hand of power. If the Left insists that law enforcement and White Supremacy are synonymous, who are we to argue? Why not apply the tactic of “agree and amplify” this meme, as we did with so many other tropes? Would not we be better received by the broader populace, as right thinking upstanding members of society, if we were in alliance with law enforcement, than as we stubbornly persist in being perceived today, as lawless enemies of the State?

Some recent news causes me to contemplate the subject.

In 2016, the Department of Homeland Security issued a Field Analysis Report detailing a “Heightened Threat Environment at Lawfully Organized White Supremacist Events” wherein “violent anti-fascists, including anarchist extremist elements, attacked a group of white supremacists who gathered for a legally permitted rally.”

The event that landed our comrade Will Planer in enemy custody was the subject of that report, and a subsequent investigation pursued Leftists as the terrorist threat, much to the dismay of the Jewish Press.

While I was awaiting trial in Virginia, headlines were made when I published a recording of a phone call I had with Charlottesville police agreeing with me, that Left wing rioters were the problem, contrary to the Jewish lies about Unite the Right.

As policing has become impossible in that city due to political correctness, Charlottesville has witnessed a “mass exodus” of officers, whom they are finding it increasingly difficult to replace.

I released another recording of a conversation I had with a detective from Charlottesville PD, in which he informed me that despite the fact that I was obviously assaulted with a weapon on August 12th 2017, and had identified my attacker, prosecutors refused to charge the case as a felony, and in any case I would have to violate a court order to lodge my complaint only to see it go unpursued. The detective was clearly uncomfortable with this state of affairs, but was powerless to do anything about it.

While I was in the custody of the Albemarle Charlottesville Regional Jail, my captors would make frequent stops on our cell block to chat. We were, by necessity, segregated from the general population, and the officers noted that it was most unusual to see Fox News on the television sets in other cell blocks. To avoid causing these men any undeserved trouble, I must be vague, but suffice it to say, the injustice of our predicament was not lost on them, even the non-White ones. Some spoke frankly about the corruption of the city, and bluntly confessed to tolerating it only because their livelihoods depended on it.

Last year, Unicorn Riot published emails obtained through a public records request, wherein Tennessee Homeland Security intelligence analyst Misty Phillips said the Traditionalist Worker Party “typically is not the issue but rather opposing groups.”

Earlier this year, a police Sergeant in Virginia was fired after being accused of having an “affinity for White Nationalist symbols” by an Antifa group.

Just last month, a group calling itself the Plain View Project published a catalog of what it described as racist (translation, awesome) social media posts by police officers, along with names of hundreds of police officers they say belonged to racist and violent social media groups. In Philadelphia, 13 officers were fired over the scandal.

More recently, Pro Publica infiltrated a Facebook group called “I’m 10-15,” Border Patrol code for “aliens in custody.” They were none too fond of “The Squad” and shared some rather hilarious material pertaining to current events. That group had nearly 10,000 members.

Subsequently, CNN claims to have discovered another such group called “The Real CBP Nation.” Though smaller, they had considerable meme talent, and were just as repulsed by the communists trying to destroy our country as we are.

Over the weekend it was reported that a police officer from Gretna, Louisiana is under investigation after posting to Facebook that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is a “vile idiot” who “needs a round, and I don’t mean the kind she used to serve.”

Conspicuously absent from the leaked posts, is any mention of Jews. Law enforcement cannot help but notice the obvious social problems that come with black and brown populations, but they have, along with the rest of the country, been inoculated against anti-Semitism by the secular religion of Holocaustism. They share the mystic faith of our foreign policy failures, that America’s entry into World War II, was a holy act to rescue God’s Chosen People from history’s most evil dictator. To go against this narrative, in their minds, would be to denigrate our military, and this is a very serious taboo in law enforcement culture.  Thus, though they can readily see the problems that correlate with skin pigmentation, their eyes are yet untrained to spot the Jewish root, as they hack breathlessly away at the brown branches.

Moreover, police are trained to sympathize with victims, and who plays the victim better than a Jew? It has been reported that 50% of all “hate crimes” are against Jews, and although you and I know most of these are fake, and the rest are carried out by blacks, this wisdom is consciously absent from these supposedly racist law enforcement social media posts and groups.

Yet, as these public servants are attacked for observing the obvious decline of our civilization, who do you think is working the hardest to destroy them? How hard could it be for a trained investigator to spot the pattern, once presented with the information?

Police and their families and supporters all readily recognize that law enforcement is under attack. They are, at present, powerless to defend themselves, as they recognize not their foe. In this they are in a similar boat to Christians, and other conservatives.

Making inroads with conservative and Christian groups has largely proven elusive for White Nationalists. Once we are spotted, we are shunned and ostracized and accused of wickedness.

Law enforcement on the other hand, are actually assigned to monitor us. They have to listen, in order to pursue investigations into our activities. During the course of that investigatory work, they cannot help but be exposed to the information we are privy to. We are also the constant targets of criminal behavior by people who have been led to believe that we are without the protection of the law. This combination of factors gives us ample opportunity to communicate with law enforcement, in a way we cannot with other natural allies.

The hazards of this are, perhaps obviously, too numerous to list. But let’s give the most obvious reasons some contemplation.

Our own cultural influences are the greatest obstacle, even if not the most obvious. I know from experience that collaboration with law enforcement, even if done openly and honestly, is called “snitching” by elements of the movement. However, to the trained eye, it becomes obvious that the people most hostile to such communications are those whom you’ll never have a chance to meet in person, most of whom operate under aliases and could not be picked out of a lineup. For all we know, they are hasbara trolls in Tel Aviv.

Indeed, this would be the most obvious explanation for their hostility to the concept. You’ll also find these types hostile to Donald Trump and the Republican Party, and while a healthy skepticism toward “Capitalism” is warranted in today’s environment, and grifters in the movement are not exactly unheard of, they launch into hysterics about “shekels” anytime a Nationalist tries to make money, which is obviously a prerequisite of meaningful political activity. Any effort we make to get in proximity to power, to profit, or to recruit new members into our ranks from less radical elements, is met with hysterical claims about immorality, not entirely dissimilar to the hysterical moral claims about racism from the Left.

They spend more time attacking White Nationalists and fence sitters than they do Leftists, and this tells us a great deal about their motives.

The trouble with this element extends well beyond their affinity for friendly fire. When cops, Christians, and Republicans see our memes as derogatory toward them, they are obviously disinclined to join in the fun. When the Left solicits them to condemn us, they do so with enthusiasm, and to suggest this has nothing to do with our own behavior, is to make the same error Jews make in analyzing anti-Semitism.

Particularly when it comes to law enforcement, they are inclined to believe the lies our enemies pedal about our being violent criminals, if upon inspection, we are hostile to those whose profession it is to confront that element of society. It does little good to profess the innocence of James Fields, or the Rise Above Movement, if in the next breath, one hails Dylann Roof as a Saint.

Anybody who thinks it beneath the dignity, or beyond the capacity, of our enemies to see that weakness, and exploit it through our need for anonymity, is a fool. While many good men surely fall into this trap, those who set the trap are anything but.

The more obvious, if less likely hazard, is the prospect of opening oneself or one’s associates to persecution at the hands of the State. While this risk can be mitigated substantially through obedience to the law, it can never be completely eliminated.

Owing in part to the above mentioned cultural influences within our movement, and in part to the incentives provided by our more forthcoming adversaries, law enforcement can easily come under the impression that their collective and individual interests are served by making human sacrifices of White Nationalists. Some will leap at the opportunity to prove their anti-racist credentials, by using every tool at their disposal to harm us. Similarly, some will prove hesitant to take action against criminals who attack us, for fear of being seen as “protecting Nazis”.

Law enforcement is permitted, and indeed trained, to lie to suspects. While you may think you are recruiting a law enforcement official to our cause, he may well be feigning sympathy as a route to access information which could subsequently be misused.

A friendly liaison with law enforcement in day to day life, could result in unwarranted suspicion, should circumstances later dictate that silence become the better strategy. If one maintains a general policy of not speaking to law enforcement, then all is going according to plan when one laywers up. A general willingness to talk, which is revoked upon a changing of subjects, understandably could lead to increased and unwelcomed scrutiny from law enforcement.

In dealing with federal law enforcement, and with many state and local agencies, it is a crime to provide false information to investigators. This is selectively enforced, as was most prominently on display in the prosecutions stemming from the Mueller investigation into the Trump campaign, juxtaposed with Hillary Clinton’s email “matter”. If Michael Flynn, Jerome Corsi, Roger Stone, Michael Cohen, and Paul Manafort can fall victim to such traps,  a lowly member of the Radical Agenda audience would be quite powerless to avoid the same fate, should his interactions with law enforcement prove hostile to his interests.

Then of course there is the all too real fact that some among us actually do run afoul of the law, sometimes intentionally, and with varying degrees of merit for their reasoning to do so. Though we are generally in opposition to vice, property crime, and initiatory violence, our perilous dealings with the financial system, for example, could result in what might charitably be described as paperwork errors. Some may doubt the legitimacy of laws infringing upon their 2nd Amendment rights, or have missed the memo about the bump stock ban, or have difficulty counting the round capacity of his magazines in a place where limits are imposed on such things. The line between self defense and criminal violence is often exceedingly technical, and putting aside for a moment the very real prospect of being prosecuted for legitimate self defense, it is not unheard of for a legitimate exercise of defensive force to actually cross the line into criminal violence, whether through ignorance of the law, or the passions of the moment. Whatever the case, one who strays from the guidance of statutes, would obviously be well served to maintain a safe distance from those who enforce them.

While these hazards are very real, and the risks difficult to overstate, I would make the case that the greater peril lies in our present course.

As it stands, the communists are the ones doing all the talking when investigations proceed into our activities. If they are the only source of information that law enforcement can access, then we have no right to be surprised when we are treated as criminals. If someone accuses you of being a criminal, and whether owing to peer pressure or misguided moral concerns, you refuse to proclaim your own innocence, then law enforcement cannot be accused of wrongdoing for operating under the assumption that the accuser has a point.

Moreover, if one only proclaims their innocence during interrogation, after arrest, or at trial, then he is not so different in the eyes of most, than any actual criminal. A proactively positive relationship with authorities is far less common for thieves and predators, than are denials ex post facto.

So intimidated are we by the perils of interactions with the State, that we often fail to report crimes committed against us. Those crimes thus continue unabated, ultimately resulting in escalation of violent conflicts, which necessarily result in self defense situations, thereby raising the aforementioned prospect of being prosecuted for legitimate use of defensive force. Better to lodge a harassment complaint, I’d say, than to ignore warnings that violence may be on the horizon.

Say you were receiving threatening messages from Left wing agitators, and let us imagine that later on down the line, one of those agitators decided to make good on the threat. Let us further imagine that you were a combat capable man, perhaps with a carry permit, and when the threat materialized, you neutralized it forcibly.

Let us picture the aftermath under two sets of circumstances.

In one circumstance, you reported your threatening messages to law enforcement when they came in. You did everything in your power to help the government deal with the issue before it rose to the level of your needing to defend yourself. During the investigation into the incident, law enforcement is aware of your prudence, and this influences their perceptions about the circumstances of the encounter, whether you opt to speak to them now, or not.

In the other, you abide by the rules of a prison gang. No talking to cops. You dare your tormentor to try and follow through on his threat, assuring him that you look forward to the opportunity. He takes you up on the invitation, and is promptly carried off by first responders. You tell those first responders only about your adherence to the inmate code, and demand an attorney.

If your assailant is fortunate enough to be breathing, he is terribly unlikely to confess his crime. Rather, he enthusiastically informs the authorities from his hospital bed, that he was out there virtuously expressing his opposition to genocide, when a Nazi shouted an epithet describing some favored demographic of the Democrat Party, and shot him for no reason at all.

Now, I’d not be so foolishly confident in our justice system to say that either would certainly result in a judicious outcome. Indeed, my own experience betrays the message I mean to convey. In Charlottesville, we did coordinate with law enforcement in advance, doing everything in our power to avoid violence, and using only such force as was necessary to neutralize the threats that nonetheless emerged. And yet, I was imprisoned for 107 days, and held against my will on electronic monitoring for another seven months or so, before being coerced into a plea deal in order to keep my gun rights intact. The men I shared those cages with, had no such opportunity, and remain in Virginia custody to this day. Even now, I remain a defendant in frivolous lawsuits which will most likely bankrupt me even upon my vindication.

But I sure am glad to have all this proof that we proactively coordinated with law enforcement, even though they did betray us, and the outcome was spectacularly horrible. However precarious my situation may be today, it would surely have been worse had I lacked the ability to point to the video and say “Here I am, insisting that I will only participate if law enforcement is involved”.

Perhaps more importantly, I have come to regret much of my unwise commentary prior to all of this. My many inflammatory statements about law enforcement, born of misguided Utopian libertarian ideals, surely made it easier for cops and prosecutors to justify their involvement in the corruption. They saw the conflict on those streets as one between two extremist elements, both hostile to their interests. The political organs ordered them to let the violence ensue, and they gladly obliged, as it surely seemed senseless to risk their safety or careers for the sake of either.

And when the orders came down to persecute only one side, what reason had they to care which side it was? What care they if the truth favored our interests, seeing as to how our interests were at odds with theirs? Had they any cause to think that we would risk our necks to help them? Quite the contrary.

Emboldened by the ordeal, communists now riot with impunity. They have taken up arms, and revolution is on the tip of every tongue Left of Ted Cruz. Absent some yet unforeseen change in circumstances, we are well on our way to a broader and more conspicuous breakdown of the civil order, as the thin blue line grows thinner by the day.

Should we fail to hold back the Red tide, and chaos overtakes us, those of us set to the task of restoring order will receive our mandate not from badges or officialdom, but rather, from a higher authority. To accomplish that righteous purpose, a mutual shifting of perceptions, and mutual forgiveness of our respective sins, will be necessary for all involved, to form the sort of alliances necessary to overcome the challenges of that monumental undertaking.

We can set ourselves to that mission today, or we can do so in the haze of revolution.

But make no mistake, we’ll have to do it at some point.



There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E053 – Up The Escalator

The Reds have been in hysterics all week over Trump’s “racist tweets” – which has now been officially defined as literally any criticism of brown skinned communists who hate the country they were elected to serve. The House of Representin’ voted 240 to 187, almost entirely along party lines, to condemn the microholocaust tapped out by the President  in the hours before a massive roundup of illegal immigrants failed to materialize.

Only four Republicans, and former Republican turned future Libertarian joke candidate Justin Amash, joined the unanimous Democrat vote in supporting the House Resolution. The Republicans who voted for the resolution were Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), Will Hurd (R-TX), Fred Upton (R-MI), and Susan Brooks (R-IN). We await word on how their gender transition processes are coming along, and whether the Internet has enough parentheses to sufficiently mark up their donor lists.

While the Radical Agenda research team investigates these crucial questions, the Nation becomes more Nazified by the second. Trump supporters chanted “Send Her Back!” at his speech in North Carolina last night. Concrete proof that racist tweets result in racist chants, and racist chants, result in hysterical Jewish media, which results in more racist voters.

I titled the most recent episode of Outlaw Conservative “Stop Resisting” and suggested conservatives would do well to stop arguing with Leftists who call them racists. This is not a strategy most could feel comfortable pursuing at present, but we do seem to be getting close to that point.

Chris Cuomo damn near had a heart attack while talking to Kris Kobach, a Republican candidate for the United States Senate in Kansas. He spent most of the discussion trying to get Kobach to call the President a racist, and when he completely failed to accomplish this pathetic feat, he retreated to what he thought was a safer position. Cuomo asked Kobach “What would you do if the president said, ‘I am a racist. That’s why I said it.’ What would you do?”

“Uh, then I would not defend him, because there’s no excuse for racism in America,” Kobach responded first.

“Really?” Cuomo asked. “Would you still support him as president?”

Kobach paused. “Uhm. I don’t know.”

“You have to think about it!” Cuomo exclaimed. “You have to think about whether or not you would support a racist! Really!?”

“I’d have to know who was running against him,” Kobach said.

“A racist! An admitted racist you would have to know more?” Cuomo continued, as Kobach stammered. “Kris, come on man. It can’t be that partisan.”

“These are ridiculous hypotheticals,” Kobach protested.

“It’s ridiculous that it took you that long to answer it,” Cuomo said. “You’re running for Senate, and you have to take a pause whether or not if he said he was a racist you’d still support him. Come on, brother.”

Cuomo feigned shock at Kobach’s failure to follow the expected protocols of Jewish programming, but you could tell he was more afraid than surprised. That momentary silence was like the sound of screeching tires to the CNN host. There he was, firmly in control of the National vehicle, hands on the wheel, certain nothing could deter the Ship of State from its Leftward course. Then, all of a sudden, a White man had the courage to say he might just vote for an unapologetic racist on national television.

There were a lot of those “deer in the headlights” type stares from the Left this week. Since time immemorial, Jews and their pets have safely operated under the assumption that they could evade the rules of civil discourse by accusing their opponents of racism. It was working out pretty well, too. Until they overplayed their hand, and convinced the populace that President of the United States and the #2 show in cable news were White Nationalists.

Kinda hard to make people think White Nationalism is some kind of bizarre irrational evil, when stadiums full of people are joyously chanting, free of fear, with the Nation’s most influential people smiling and nodding in approval.

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Outlaw Conservative S01E026 – Stop Resisting

The last words many criminals hear are “Stop Resisting!”

Today being the anniversary of the death of Eric Garner, it is worth contemplating the implications…

In rare, though not unfathomable circumstances, decent, innocent folks might meet a similar fate. However, innocent folks tend to heed the advise, and sort out confusions in the court system. Thereby avoiding the need to say “I can’t breath” on their way to the morgue. Here I’ll suggest that our fellow conservatives take a similar course when accused of racism by hysterical Left wingers, who are, in the words of Lindsay Graham, “a bunch of communists.”

“Racist tweets” has been the most repeated phrase in American politics for the last week, topping “manufactured crisis” and “Russian collusion” in frequency if not duration. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ran afoul of House parliamentary rules this week, by trying to turn the House floor into a CNN panel with the phrasing. Rachel Maddow used the image of your humble correspondent on Monday night to call the president a racist. The entire Leftist media, and more than a few coward Republicans, have been mindlessly repeating the catch phrase ever since President Trump told a bunch of America hating members of the House, essentially, “love it or leave it”.

Since these four communists happen to be “women of color” the tweets were condemned by the usual suspects as racist, and from there, a familiar debate ensued over what is and is not racist. As is par for the course, nothing positive has come from the ensuing discourse, for reasons a properly educated society should not need to have explained to them.

Many years ago, in a former life, I was guest on the Tom Woods show. Back then, I thought being a racist was a very bad thing, and was offended when people accused me of this wicked sin. The accusation came in so frequently, and so meritlessly, that I eventually decided it had lost all of its meaning. So during the interview I said to Mr. Woods, something to the effect of “When somebody calls you a racist, the best thing you can say is, ‘And?'”

The term racist has always been ill defined, and more of a tactic than a description of some illicit behavior. In recent years, it has become more of a racial epithet hurled at White people, not entirely dissimilar to words which would get you banned from Facebook for describing blacks or Jews. As the hysteria gets ratcheted up beyond any comprehensible measure, Jews like Ben Shapiro and Blacks like Ben Carson are similarly accused, and the resulting dilution of the terminology is, I think, a positive thing for the future of America. Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E052 – Welcome Home, Will Planer

Will Planer is a combat veteran of the race war, who served his Race & Nation valiantly in the Battle of Sacramento in June of 2016. He, along with 18 other men, subsequently dubbed the “Sacramento Spartans” braved 20 to 1 odds, as hundreds of armed Left wing degenerates assaulted them in full view of the public while law enforcement did nothing.

He was struck, pepper sprayed, and in his blind retreat, hit a tranny with one of the clubs he had taken from a Leftist rioter.

For this, he was charged with a felony, and held without bail for nearly two years awaiting trial.

At trial, the jury was deadlocked, and a mistrial declared.

Rather than release will from captivity, authorities continued to hold him without bail. They planned a second trial, and held him for several more months. Then, they made him an offer he couldn’t refuse. Plead guilty and go home, or remain in jail awaiting the judgement of a California jury.

Wisely, Will gave into their demands, and is thus able to join us as our guest on this evening’s live airing of the Radical Agenda.

The Battle of Sacramento became the subject of a DHS report on “anarchist extremists” committing violence at lawfully organized “white supremacist” rallies. The attack was organized by none other than Yvette Felarca of “By Any Means Necessary” (BAMN), who famously went on Fox News and advocated for politically motivated acts of criminal initiatory violence (terrorism) against “fascists” like gay Jewish immigrant Milo Yiannopoulos. Falarca was also ordered to pay attorney’s fees after filing frivolous lawsuits.

News media went insane when they found out that law enforcement rightly investigated the communists as the terrorist threat. Despite an abundance of evidence, the Jewish press was largely successful in altering public perceptions on the facts. Just over a year later, Pro-White groups were again assaulted in Charlottesville, and again unjustly prosecuted.

But day by day, the narrative becomes more difficult to maintain. The Left has become completely unmoored from reality and public perception, as they shield themselves from all criticism. Lacking any awareness of public sentiment, they insist that even the ruthless gang assault of a gay Asian reporter, resulting in a brain hemorrhage, is justified, so long as it is done in the name of advancing the interests of the Democrat Party.

They can smear me and Will Planer, but how far can they go? And once they have crossed the threshold, what will the consequences be?

Only time will tell, but I look forward to discussing recent history, and the prospects for our future, with my fellow veteran on the show today.

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E051 – All Ages

Drag Queen Story Hour has been making headlines across the country for months. Sane people everywhere are revolting against the Jewish onslaught of child sexualization, and being branded as Nazis for their trouble. Eventually, they’ll stop eschewing the label, one can hope.

But the Jew never rests. He never backs down. He is a relentless pervert, and the ultimate accelerationist of his own demise. Continue reading

Outlaw Conservative S01E025 – Amash The System

Ah, the libertarians. Sometimes they make you think. Sometimes they make you question your own beliefs. Sometimes they inspire you to look beyond the State, and imagine the infinite possibilities of mankind unbound from coercive systems of control.

But mostly, these days, they just make you want to puke.

It’s funny to me, looking back into my not so distant history. I thought libertarianism was the solution to all our political disputes. You can do whatever you want, so long as I don’t have to pay for it. It made perfect sense. I was a fanatical libertarian.

Eventually though, it became impossible not to notice a certain tendency among my peers. There seemed to be a lot more “Do whatever you want” than “so long as I don’t have to pay for it”. Vice and conflict avoidance became the guiding themes. It seemed as though all the intellectual energy that had drawn me into the movement had been lost.

My libertarianism was angry. Michael Badnarik made me romanticise the American Revolution, and long for a new one. Murray Rothbard made me hate the State. Ayn Rand showed me that happy Leftist buzzwords were scams to be renounced and vilified. I was driven by a righteous fury, and a thirst for justice.

Then, seemingly out of nowhere, it seemed like everybody just wanted to walk around naked and smoke marijuana. All we had to do, the thinking seemed to go, was get high and have sex and complain about the cops, and eventually Bitcoin would do away with the economic controls.

Suddenly socially conservative policies started to make a lot of sense. If this is what sex and dope do to libertarians, we really can’t expect it to have a better impact on Leftists. Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E050 – Double Dealers

Milo Yiannopoulos, Gavin McInnes, and Laura Loomer held a free speech rally over the weekend in the District of Criminals. It was really edgy.  Milo dressed up as a woman and pretended to be Laura Loomer.

No word on what bathrooms he used.

Radical Agenda S05E050 - Double Dealers

Radical Agenda S05E050 – Double Dealers

As Milo handed the microphone to the real Laura Loomer, they had a bit of a debate over which of them was the most banned person on the Internet. Each insisting that they were in fact the biggest victim of tech censorship. In the end, Laura Loomer walked away with the title, after announcing that she had been banned from Uber Eats.

I wasn’t at the event mind you. I would have liked to have been, but I was too busy dealing with the fallout from a DDOS attack against my web server, and the shutdown of my mail server by the Deluxe Corporation. I was also short on funds because of donation processing for Outlaw Conservative having been shut down by MasterCard.

Fortunately, I didn’t have to be at the event to see it. It was streamed live on YouTube by multiple people. There are plenty of highlight reels on that platform as well. While you’re on YouTube, you can also stop by Laura’s YouTube channel and join over 85,000 people in subscribing to her. She’s definitely more censored than Milo it turns out, he has over 865,000 subscribers on his YouTube channel.

I can’t subscribe because I’m banned from YouTube. I can’t even log in to watch an age restricted video. Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E049 – Medic!

When Big Tech censored “Nazis and White Supremacists” nobody cared much. When Facebook expanded the hunt to “White Nationalists” few saw much of a distinction. When they decided Jews and homosexuals fit the description and banned them, few besides the followers of those figures blinked. As the definition of “hate speech” begins to ensnare “borderline” content, like that of Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson, awareness of the problem is growing, but action has yet to ensue. Even as Google execs are caught on camera confessing this is an intentional effort to unlawfully interfere in the next presidential election, startlingly little has been done to stop the attack.

Rewarded with political success in the 2018 midterms, and facing no meaningful opposition, it should come as no surprise that this threat only hastens its metastasis. If a person or group can impose their political views on the populace, why stop there?

Google and Facebook have now endeavored to expand their mission of perfect ideological conformative hygiene to include medicine. Continue reading

Outlaw Conservative S01E024 – Death Rattle

The stench of desperation emanating from the Left is absolutely nauseating.

Unlike us, they have no fear of being assaulted in the street for their political views. They certainly never have trouble finding money. They enjoy the unwavering support of the media. They won’t be censored on social media, or be banned from large service providers, even if they commit felonies and brag about them in public. Speaking of felonies, prosecutors seem awfully reluctant to prosecute them, even when their criminal behavior is caught on camera in broad daylight.

Being a Leftist is a pretty sweet gig, really…

So why are they so miserable? Why the constant state of panic? Why the violent and frenzied opposition to anyone who dares to deviate from the Narrative?

Given all their comforts and advantages, one might expect Leftists to display the sort of cool confidence normally reserved for the most secure amongst us. Yet no voice is too small to crush for this seemingly untouchable ideological sect. From Tucker Carlson, to Alex Jones, all the way down to lil ole me, the most powerful people in the world react as though their lives were in danger so long as anyone who contradicts them draws breath.

Perhaps their fears are well founded… Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E048 – Ending Pride

Summer is in full swing, as we prepare to celebrate America’s Independence Day. The sun is blazing, women are looking hot their burkinis, Salvadorans are drowning in the Rio Grande, the blacks are slaughtering one another in the hood, and the Democrat Party is blaming it on White folks. All telltale signs that the season of beaches and barbeques is upon us.

Here at the Radical Agenda, we had to take a couple of days off last week. There were good reasons for this, but for the sake of making a joke, we’ll pretend we were celebrating LGBTQ Pride Month. Now that June has ended, we’re glad to have the approval of the Jews to hate faggots and trannies once more, as the good Lord commands.

The Jews of the Southern Poverty Law Center seem to have missed the memo on queers delivered by the Old Testament. Either that, or they just want to push degenerate filth on we goyim for their own amusement. Cassie Miller laments a “Hatewatch review of internet chatter” wherein your humble correspondant is quoted as saying that only assisted suicide can cure transgenderism. Other “far Right” figures, less worthy of mention were also quoted, in a desperate, if familiar, attempt to paint White Nationalists as the primary cause of suffering for mankind’s thus far lowest form of degeneracy. Rolling Stone likewise mindlessly repeated the fiction, though noting that the SPLC “did not release any hard data or figures”.

I wonder why that is?

Unfortunately for the transgender community, we Nazis have better things to risk life imprisonment over, than to help the mentally ill achieve their goal of escaping their biological reality. While Cassie and her coethnic employers strain to suggest that our observations of reality constitute murder, not a single real “threat” was quoted to confirm the misleading title of the slanderous blog post.

That didn’t stop serial conservative coward, Tyler O’Neil at PJMedia, from echoing the dishonest narrative as he attempted desperately to distance himself from we deplorables. As though reacting only to the headline, Tyler opines;

These threats are disgusting and most opponents of transgender activism and most opponents of Drag Queen Story Hour would condemn them. But Miller seeks to associate the much more broad dissent with white nationalism and violence.

Perhaps if Tyler had a spine he would have noticed that Ms. Miller had undermined her own case, by linking to a New York Times article about a Dallas Police probe “into four unsolved murders of transgender women”. Though one might consider the case unsolved until the suspect is convicted, the piece linked is titled “Man Charged With Murdering Transgender Woman and 2 Others in Dallas,” and lest the reader think the headline was updated after the Jewess linked to it, the URL for the post specifically mentions the arrest, and it was published on June 12th, a whole two weeks prior to Cassie’s sloppy smear job. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/12/us/transgender-woman-murder-arrest.html

Moreover, the suspect in the case is named Kendrell Lavar Lyles, and, you guessed it, he’s black.

This comes as no surprise to the Radical Agenda audience, so pardon my repetition, but this bears repeating. Jews, and their pets, keep on repeating this line about “transgender women of color” winding up dead, as if that was somehow unpredictable. They then turn around and blame the predictable consequences of transgender behavior on White Supremacy.

Yet, on the entirely too rare occasion that a murderer does a tranny a favor, these freaks tend to die by the hands of their coethnics, just like everybody else. Moreover, on the rare occasion that murder is committed across racial lines, we know from an abundance data that it is usually blacks who transgress the boundaries. Thus when trannies want money they come to suburbs, and when they want to depart this plane of existence, they go to the hood.

Of course, Tyler and his ilk dare not mention any of this, for fear of the Jews. If God’s Chosen People sterilize and abort every last goyim child, leaving the Earth to the likes of Kamala Harris and Corey Booker, that is a price worth paying so long as it permits Tyler to avoid the wrath of Jack Dorsey. Of course, many a conservative activist have attempted to straddle that line, only to find out the hard way that the line, and the Jews who drew it, have other plans.

Tyler’s is a failed strategy, and a faux ideology, desperately clinging to the idiotic notion that Drag Queen Story Hour is part of some kind of honest negotiation. But transgenderism, like Holocaust mythology, requires force of law to perpetuate itself specifically because it is dishonest by design. Any honest observer will find it obvious that the Jews will stop poisoning our children with cross sex hormones and communist propaganda when they are forced to, and no sooner.

The civil, and preferred, way to go about applying that force, is to organize against the Jews politically and prohibit their subversive activity through legal penalties. The alternative, as Cassie Miller clearly sees even before it emerges, is vigilante violence. There is not a third alternative where this continues unchecked, as societal survival mechanisms must eventually outweigh want of access to Jewish banking services. Anyone pretending otherwise is far more culpable for the ensuing violence than even the most virulent accelerationist could ever hope to be.

The Jews thrust transgenderism upon us, with all the familiar patterns of subversion that have earned them the enmity of every other race, nation, tribe, and faith ever to suffer the misfortune of knowing them. They wield their undue influence in media and finance to demonize the ones who see the obviously ethnic origins of the assault, and send everyone else who might contemplate resistance into frenzied denials.

For now, anyway…

Today, the Jews of the SPLC say “If you oppose Drag Queen Story Hour, you’re a Nazi” and the Tyler O’Neils of the world say “No we’re not! Please don’t hurt me, Jew!”

Eventually though, the tactic will wear thin. Eventually, when every defense of truth and decency becomes a free advertisement for National Socialism, the trick will have backfired. Eventually the Jews will say “Anyone who opposes Drag Queen Story Hour is a Nazi!” and the goyim will respond “Yes, Jew. Indeed we are. Now get this filth away from our children, before your Holocaust myth comes true”.


Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

The players on this site now have 24/7/365 streaming content!

You can always listen to live Radical Agenda episodes at




[mcc_donations alignment=”center” currencies=”” primary_currency=”BTC” show_currencies_as_icons=”1″ show_currencies_as_select=”1″ show_currency_as_text=”1″ show_address=”1″ qr_code_enabled=”1″ qr_code_max_width=”180″]


This production is made possible by the financial support of listeners and readers like you. I literally cannot do this without you. 

Become an OutlawConservative.com Premium Member!

Shop At EdgyGoodies.com!

Like my voice? Hire me to read the text of your choice at PennedAndPronounced.com