Nancy Pelosi’s decision to begin her impeachment announcement with words from America’s Declaration of Independence, could not have been more fit to the purpose of the stunt. That only makes sense, if you realize that …
There’s that phrase again. “Conspiracy Theory” has been uttered very frequently as of late, by desperate politicians, clinging to power like their lives depend on it. We hear this often enough that I could, and …
Disgraced FBI lawyer Lisa Page, best known for having sex with a married co-worker, and abusing the power of her office to assist Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election, has recently come out of …
Today’s episode of the Radical Agenda will be audio only, and will be airing late due to my ongoing travels. I’ll send an email out to mailing list subscribers before I go on air. You can listen live on TuneIn, or using the raw audio stream with your browser or favorite streaming app.
Radical Agenda EP292 – Dark Adventures
I’m on my way back from Auburn Alabama, where Richard Spencer scored a huge victory for contract obligation, free speech, and identitarian movements. I stopped off in Atlanta for a couple of nights, and had some fantastic adventures in a neighborhood where my complexion makes me stick out like a sore thumb.
Additionally, Fox News covered fake hate crimes, another ISIS terrorist attack in France just ahead of the elections there, and of course, your calls at 747-234-2254 or RadicalAgenda on Skype.
Today I’ll be doing an audio only episode of the show, due to the not so great Internet connectivity at the hotel I’m staying at. You can listen on TuneIn, or using the raw audio stream with your browser or favorite streaming app.
Radical Agenda EP291 – Awe, Burn!
I’m at this hotel, because as you may have heard, I was in Auburn Alabama last night for a Richard Spencer event. He was on episode 290 with me discussing the trouble leading up to it. Specifically that he had gone to some expense and paid for security and the University cancelled his speaking engagement because of terrorist threats from left wing criminals.
Justice does occasionally prevail, however. Richard announced yesterday afternoon that a court ordered Auburn University to honor their agreement with him, and host the event. I’ve not had time yet to research the legalese behind the case, so I cannot speak intelligently to the actual legal argument, but I’m glad he won, whatever the merits. Auburn is a State University. It is subsidized, like nearly all colleges, by the Federal Government. If you listen to the mainstream media, Richard Spencer and Vladimir Putin might as well have been the only people who voted for Donald Trump, and yet they were so powerful that together they made him President of the United States anyway. A public institution shunning relevant speakers because they disagree with his politics is completely unacceptable. Surely, there have been far more dangerous, and far less relevant people than Richard allowed to speak on this and other campuses. Denying him a platform is purely politically motivated, and it is impossible to pretend otherwise.
I arrived just as the event was beginning, and it was too late for me to get inside. That didn’t bother me much though. As you know, I spend my days watching leftists go crazy, and the crowd outside the event made for a target rich environment.
There’s a lot more to get to, but I don’t think we’re going to be taking calls today.
So join us, this and every Wednesday, as well as Mondays and Fridays from 5-7pm Eastern (I might cut it short today due to lack of calls and video) for another exciting episode the Radical Agenda. It’s a show about common sense extremism where we talk about radical, crazy, off the wall things like stampeding communists.
Richard Spencer was scheduled to speak at Auburn University in Alabama on Tuesday, April 18th at 7:00pm Eastern, until left wing terrorists threatened the university and the cowards who run it took that opportunity to shut down the event. Or so they thought. Richard says he is going to be showing up anyway, though the details are being kept under a certain layer of operational security.
Radical Agenda EP290 – Heckler’s Veto
I’ll be attending, because like many of you I am sick and tired of violent, dishonest people shutting down open discourse just because the truth interferes with their political agenda and warped worldview. It’s a long ride for me, but worth the time, effort, and risk. I cannot continue to sit in front of my television and watch these people destroy my country while I wait for this insanity to make its way to New Hampshire.
Richard will be joining me for 15 minutes to discuss what led up to this, and what you should do if you want to get involved.
Due to the time constraints the travel places upon me, I won’t be able to do the regularly scheduled Monday show. This Sunday special will have to suffice, but I should be able to make it in time for Wednesday.
So join us, this Easter Sunday at 10:00pm Eastern for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda. It’s a show about common sense extremism where we talk about radical, crazy, off the wall things like free speech.
Here at the Radical Agenda, we have what might be described as mixed feelings about voting. Democracy obviously isn’t working out very well, at least not by the standards of anyone who values peace or prosperity. Some libertarians have suggested, and for a time I agreed, that boycotting elections is the answer. That by this method, we could delegitimize democratic governments and default back to some kind of Rothbardian market order.
Radical Agenda EP289 – The Franchise
There are some obvious problems with this. Most obviously, anyone who boycotted the election would necessarily have no say in its outcome, leaving control over government to one’s political rivals. Since libertarians are almost exclusively white and male in America, a libertarian boycott of the polls would leave control of the the State to women and non-whites.
Well, if you think that will bring us closer to a civilization based on property rights and contracts, then perhaps you should pack your bags and head over to South Africa. Shelley Garland, who appears at first glance to be a white male indulging in a transgender delusion, wrote a blog at the Huffington Post suggesting that white males should be “denied the franchise” or right to vote, for a period of 20-30 years in South Africa. “Her” reasoning was that white men, shockingly enough, keep on voting for policies that are in line with conservative/libertarian values, such as strong protections of private property. Without that influence, says Shelley, all of the world’s problems would be solved because they could take the white man’s property away and then everyone would have what they needed.
Unsurprisingly, there is little thought of what will happen to white women when the white vote is cut in half, and their traditional protectors no longer have a say in matters of State. It is easy to sound like a defender of women by demonizing men if your audience is stupid enough, but I doubt many South African white women are looking forward to being surrounded by black African males with no white men standing between them.
As for the economics, there really isn’t any economic analysis to respond to. Just the simple assertion that white males are bad and have property, and that non-whites will be happy when they have the fruits of the white man’s efforts. What all that capital does when it is distributed amongst people with IQs around 70 never seems to occur to Shelley. I predict a wild weekend or three will see that wealth rapidly accumulated into a few hands once again.
You might have thought this was some mistake. Some editorial error. Surely the Huffington Post would never post something so racist and sexist and anti-democratic after all their demands that racism and sexism be outlawed and ended entirely. Thankfully however, the Huffington Post reliably assured us that this blog was just what the world needed. You see, racism and sexism are not about race and sex per se. It is about ending the white race by bringing down white males and leaving their women to the mercy of other males.
There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 747-234-2254 or RadicalAgenda on Skype.
So join us, this and every Friday, as well as Mondays and Wednesdays from 5-7pm Eastern for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda. It’s a show about common sense extremism where we talk about radical, crazy, off the wall things like voting.
Augustus Invictus joins us via Skype for the entire two hours today to discuss what’s happening with him, and other pressing stories. A Facebook page too obscure to mention here tagged me in a post bashing Augustus, and when I went to see what they were about, the entire page was filled with left (((libertarian))) blogs bashing Augustus. I had so much fun looking over them by myself, that I thought this could only be improved by going over them with him, for the entertainment of the Radical Agenda audience.
Radical Agenda EP288 – AntiFa Roundup
Here’s one of my favorites: “Augustus Sol Invictus Is Not Welcome In My State” by David Colborne of the Libertarian Party of Nevada. David is concerned that Augustus is a very bad person and should thus be prevented from entering the state of Nevada. David reminds us that he has a wife and children and a job, otherwise he would resort to criminal activity to accomplish this goal. I wonder if David has written anything about preventing Islamists and communists from entering the United States?
Here is another: “Free Speech and No Platform: A Brief Libertarian Case for Silencing Fascists” over at Libertarians United Against Fascism. The author (who does not see fit to reveal his identity) claims it is fascists who refuse honest debate, not the communist rioters who set six figure fires to silence gay Jewish immigrants. By this supposed libertarian standard, the mere fact that someone has been deemed a fascist in his infinite wisdom, is evidence enough that they should be silenced by any means necessary.
There are a few others, and of course a lot of other more important stories to get to, but here is the point I want to draw here. This stopped being about principles or morality a long time ago. It seems to me the right is just now figuring this out, while the left has known it all along. The simple physics are this: One group has interests, another group has interests which are diametrically opposed to the first group’s interests, so only one can achieve their goals, and must do so at the expense of the other.
You can call it left vs right, whites vs. non-whites, communists vs. fascists, or whatever you want. Ultimately, this is us vs. them, no matter who the us and them turn out to be. We are not designed to be a global mass of harmonious humanity. We are tribal pack animals who pursue group interests the expense of other groups. If you call yourself an anti-fascist in 2017, then you’re on the side of arsonists and communists and people who assault women and senior citizens for disagreeing with their politics, and you better believe that makes you “them” as far as I’m concerned.
There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 747-234-2254 or RadicalAgenda on Skype.
So join us, this and every Wednesday, as well as Mondays and Fridays from 5-7pm Eastern for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda. It’s a show about common sense extremism where we talk about radical, crazy, off the wall things like AntiFa!
There are of course those who doubt that six trillion Jews were murdered in Hitler’s gas chambers for no other reason than to make white people happy, but those people never seem to gain the prominence of a guy like Sean Spicer. I wasn’t there, personally. But I always get skeptical when historical narratives become unlawful to question. Perhaps that’s why I’m here and not on Fox News.
The media was quick to pick up on this, and Spicer was quick to clarify that the difference was Hitler didn’t gas his own people. Shockingly enough, few if any journalists seemed comforted that Spicer differentiated between Jews and Germans in terms of who Hitler was killing. In a later interview with Wolf Blitzer, Spicer went full cuck and provided no defense at all for his statements, renouncing them completely and apologizing to literally everyone.
Given that Trump has caved on amnesty and Syria and the wall looks to be in jeopardy, perhaps we should expect that Sean will be fired before dawn. Perhaps he will leave with Jared Kushner’s shoe in his backside and an official Ivanka handprint across his cheek. After the leftist media is done destroying his career for almost brushing near doubts on certain narratives about the holocaust, perhaps he can be a guest on the Radical Agenda.
Until then, we’ll just have to keep punching up, having fun, and taking your calls at 747-234-2254 or RadicalAgenda on Skype.
So join us tonight, Tuesday April 11th 2017 at 10:15pm Eastern for a special off schedule episode of the Radical Agenda. It’s a show about common sense extremism where we talk about radical, crazy, off the wall things like racist missiles.
Here at the Radical Agenda, we typically tend to focus on Europe and America because those are the regions of primary import to our audience. We speak English, we’re white, and so trying to figure out the inner workings of places governed by savages in desperate need of some colonialism doesn’t seem the best use of our time.
Radical Agenda EP286 – Suidlanders
Of course, in a world where geographic distance means less and less due to advancements in communications, transportation, and military technology, these places occasionally find their way onto our radar anyway. On Saturday we covered the conflict in Syria, for example.
Today we have a very special guest by the name of Simon Roche, of Suidlanders. They are an emergency plan initiative officially founded in 2006 to prepare a Protestant Christian South African Minority for a coming violent revolution. He has good reason to fear such a conflict. The leader of the EFF (Economic Freedom Fighters) party there has said “We are not calling for the slaughter of white people‚ at least for now… The rightful owners of the land are black people. No white person is a rightful owner of the land here in SA and whole of the African continent‚”
South Africa is an interesting story for those of you interested in what happens when “anti-racism” is taken through to its ultimate logical conclusion. Since the supposedly racist, oppressive, apartheid white run government was handed over to black rule, conditions have not improved for pretty much anyone. Crime, poverty, and every other measure of a poorly run society have completely spiraled out of control. The whites who had the means by which to do so, have largely fled. Many who stayed behind have been raped, murdered, assaulted, or stripped of their property. Those remaining fear for their lives.
Simon is going to talk to us about this state of affairs, what his organization seeks to do about it, and how you can help. He’s been interviewed by Mike Cernovich, Jared Taylor, and other people you might recognize. Now he comes to the Radical Agenda, and will be taking your calls at 747-234-2254 or RadicalAgenda on Skype.
So join us, this and every Monday, as well as Wednesdays and Fridays from 5-7pm Eastern for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda. It’s a show about common sense extremism where we talk about radical, crazy, off the wall things like how to survive a genocide.
Yesterday I caught wind that Donald Trump launched upwards of 50 Tomahawk missiles into Syria. This was done in apparent retaliation for a sarin gas attack supposedly launched by the Assad government against his own people, killing 86, including women and children, babies even.
Now, I’m not going to say that launching nerve gas onto unsuspecting people is nice, but I think if one takes a step back and attempts to put it into perspective, this response is unwarranted. The deaths of 86 Syrians in a civil war that has raged on for the better part of a decade and killed nearly half a million people, is a mere blip on the radar. Complaints about the means by which the regime caused these particular deaths, chemical weapons,
Radical Agenda EP285 – The Left’s War
seems overblown. Women and babies killed by machine gun fire or conventional bombs are just as dead as any who choked to death with lungs full of sarin.
The fact that women and babies ended up dead is not particularly surprising to anyone who has ever paid attention to anything war related. That’s what happens in a warzone, and that of course is the reason we are given when we are told we have a moral obligation to invite hostile foreign cultures into Western societies. Given that the vast majority of these “refugees” are military aged males, it seems reasonable to think that many left behind would be women and children.
The only reason the Trump administration could possibly have for attacking Syria, and thereby escalating a potential conflict with Russia that could easily become World War III, is continuity of government. The Trump administration is making good on Obama’s threat to use American military force in the event of a chemical weapons attack, and/or caving into pressure from hostile domestic elements still embedded in the government.
Mr President, you have no obligation to do this. The Obama and Bush administrations were leftist regimes. The wars they started and never finished were leftist tactics to weaken America. Moreover, these conflicts have been purposely continued in perpetuity to continue draining America not only of its resources and standing in the community of nations, but also to empty us of our most fit and capable men.
This tactic was described by Anonymous Conservative in his book “The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics”. Leftist or r-selected regimes send the right leaning K-selected warriors of the military off to fight unnecessary and unwinnable conflicts so as to provide greater breeding opportunities for draft dodgers and cowards. While the warriors are overseas, their lesser countrymen are left with exclusive access to the women of the society. They breed, and their political ideas breed with them.
Simultaneously, we have seen both of the prior administration all but completely open the borders, even while claiming we need to have our own government spy on us to prevent attacks on the homeland. Thereby flooding the nation with more r-selected animals who will reliably vote for the hand that feeds them.
So why should we continue fighting a war that served no other purpose than to prop up our political enemies at home?
The only move to make here is to walk away. Let Russia help the Assad regime regain control over the country. We do not need to fight the wars of our enemies.
There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 747-234-2254, or RadicalAgenda on Skype.
So join us, this and every Friday, as well as Mondays and Wednesdays from 5-7pm Eastern for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda. It’s a show about common sense extremism where we talk about radical, crazy, off the wall things like looking out for your own people.
Fa real dough, like, the alt right and libertarians, yall is mostly cool and whateva. Thang is dough, ya always losin! How you gone talk to me bout supremacy, when I be out bangin mo white chicks than you? How you sposed ta tell me yall the master race when my peoples outbreed ya even after forming lines outside abortion clinics? Dawg, ya’ll be like quoting Darwin and whatnot, talkin bout evolution, but then you run around pologizin because we out killin yall and grindin wit ya bitches?
Yalls funny man, fareal. I’m pickin up what ya puttin down but ya seem to be betta at talkin den doin. Holla at me, 747-234-2254 or RadicalAgenda on Skype.
Join us, for this special April Fool’s Day episode of the Radical Agenda, from 7-9pm Eastern. It’s a show bout killin whitey where we talkin bout radical, crazy, off the wall thangs like bein kangz.
Here at the Radical Agenda, we’ve come to accept factionalism as factual. Whatever merit there may or may not be to an idea, so long as the selective pressures of an economy permit the survival of parasites, nonsense will thrive. In the absence of such subsidies, it cannot exist. For these reasons and others, very sensible people have long insisted that we just need to rid ourselves of the welfare state, and then all will be well with the world.
Radical Agenda EP283 – Caucus
There are two rather glaring problems with this strategy. Firstly, we live in a hyperinclusive mass democracy, where courts prevent the President of the United States from guarding our borders during wartime, because they think he’s a racist. Secondly, the entire point of a welfare state is to breed and import more welfare recipients who will vote for it. To put it bluntly, this problem is not going to get solved democratically. While we can celebrate what few electoral victories we may have remaining, any man who isn’t preparing himself for less verbose conflicts, may as well be digging his own ditch.
We are in a fight for our survival, and the weapon in play is the State. The stakes are so high, that our fate may already have been sealed. We are not just trying to delay some future catastrophe. For our people to survive at this point, we will have to cede some territory, and remove the invaders from that which we can still defend. We are literally fighting for nothing short of the survival of the white race, because without the white race, there will be no constitutional conservatism, there will be no such thing as libertarianism. Nobody will ponder about the greater good, or the primacy of the individual. Never again will someone read Lysander Spooner on the floor of the United States Senate. We will instead become every third world hellhole the neocons told us we had to liberate with the blood of our sons, and soon, that of our daughters.
I’m not going to say that our other differences don’t matter. On the right, we have plenty to debate. There is only one binding purpose of the right, and that is to diminish the left. However hard any number of content producers may try to make it seem this way, there isn’t a definitive right wing solution to every calculation. What separates us from our leftist rivals, is that we seek to see the problem solved, and that they seek to say the problem doesn’t exist. The number of ways we might go about solving it, are just as numerous as the number of ways they can go about exacerbating it.
That’s why we have primaries. That’s why I’m a Republican. We, the people who want to solve the problem, debate the best way to do it, and we have a contest to decide who will represent us against our enemies who want to make the problem worse. I could think of better ways to make these decisions, but I suspect things will have to get pretty bad in the West before men wage war against their own governments in hopes of putting an end to democracy.
Until then, this is what we’ve got, and unsurprisingly, it’s not working out very well. Let’s take this Obamacare “repeal and replace” nonsense under a microscope for example. Donald Trump promised to repeal Obamacare, just like every Republican presidential candidate, despite the fact that none of them actually have the constitutional authority to repeal laws. I mean, sure, Congress had no right to pass Obamacare in the first place, but unless you thought our next executive intended to tell Congress and the Courts to burn in hell, the failure of that bill was as predictable as the sunrise.
At first glance, it seems as though Trump, Ryan, and the other supporters of the bill insulted our intelligence by talking about doing it in phases. Without 60 votes in the Senate, they cannot pass anything that cannot be passed under reconciliation, so anything that couldn’t be passed in phase one would require major electoral victories for Republicans in the coming House and Senate races. Unfortunately every subhuman Democrat is on the verge of insurrection, and fairly unlikely to stay away from the polls in 2018 and 2020.
The Republican Party needs to do whatever it can to secure their foothold in the federal government, or we might never recover. So while I sympathize with Rand Paul, Justin Amash, and the “Freedom Caucus” on a lot of things, I’m anxiously awaiting the announcement of their plan to accomplish something other than obstructing the President. We can quibble all we want about how “moderates” should be the ones caving in to the demands of our obviously better ideas, but unless we’re going to chuck them out of helicopters and appoint their replacements non-democratically, the math is not on our side here.
I have no problem referring to the American Health Care Act as “Obamacare Lite” because that’s what it is. It’s just shuffling around the wealth redistribution mechanism a little bit. It’s not a repudiation of the “healthcare is a right” narrative. It completely fails to acknowledge that insurance is supposed to be a financial loss by default. It is exactly what we should expect from a guy like Paul Ryan.
On the other hand, it dramatically cuts taxes on the wealthy, and if they don’t donate those savings to the success of the Republican Party, I’ll gladly join you in calling for their taxes to be increased again. Perhaps more importantly, it defunded Planned Parenthood to the tune of nearly half a billion dollars a year. Taking subsidies away from the nation’s largest abortion clinic, and giving that money back to the people who earned it, seems like a really good way to Make America Great Again.
Defunding Planned Parenthood should have been the headline about that bill. There is no number of future Democrats that Planned Parenthood could have killed in the womb, to make up for the number of Democrats they have made out of white women with their political propaganda. That money would be far better spent in the hands of the Koch Brothers, and Donald Trump’s wealthy friends, than in the hands of Cecile Richards.
It’s a fine thing to have principles. It’s good to deal peaceably and honestly with people who deal with you in the same fashion. It is suicide to adopt the principles of your rivals as your standard of virtue, and to adhere to them even while your rivals do not.
The constitution will not save America, and the only evidence we need of that is the newspaper of any given place on any given day. Ideas can only survive so long as the people who believe in them do, and anyone who believes in freedom had better stop checking the history books for cute ways to talk about ancient documents, and start thinking of creative ways to destroy our enemies before they destroy us.
And speaking of people with misguided ideas about freedom, Ian Freeman joins me in studio today to discuss sanctuary cities. He thinks they’re a great idea, and as you might have gathered, I disagree.
So join us, this and every Friday, as well as Mondays and Wednesdays, from 5-7pm Eastern for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda. It’s show about common sense extremism where we talk about radical, crazy, off the wall things like principles.