Radical Agenda S05E091 – Jewish Nationals

I have to start today’s episode off by telling you that I’m mostly kidding. Though, not entirely.

That is a consistent challenge here at the Radical Agenda, which I do not state nearly often enough. This is largely because it is fun to watch people try and figure out where the news ends and the fun begins. Though, to be honest, I’m often as unsure of this as the listener. The Radical Agenda could, in some respects, be seen as the ultimate expression of “Poe’s Law”.

In Poe’s case, he had stated “Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won’t mistake for the genuine article.”

This was later extrapolated to encompass really any variety of extremism. Normally, when one sets out to parody a thing, they exaggerate it to the point of absurdity. When a thing begins with absurdity, it renders parody difficult, if not impossible.

Not long ago, one might parody homosexuality by equating it with transgenderism. Today, the LGB lobby welcomes the addition of T to their acronym, and before this was even done settling, they put on “Q+” just to make sure all future conceptions of degeneracy would find a welcoming abuse of language under their tent.

Today, it is almost impossible to exaggerate Jews.

The stereotypes of Jews are many, of course. They run the media, the banks, the world, really. They are greedy, which, to the uninitiated, presents a cognitive challenge when reconciling their love of communism. They are disloyal to their host countries, of course, but are they cured of this inclination to subversion by Zionism, and their own ethnostate?

Depends on the Jew…

Perhaps the most noteworthy Jewish stereotype is their neurosis, paranoia, and constant fear of persecution. Countless millions of dollars are extracted from ordinary Jewish people, by their swindling coethnics, fighting a neverending war on anti-Semitism, which, the rarer it becomes, the more frequently it is seen. Humorously, the more paranoid the Jew becomes, the more frequently he accuses people of anti-Semitism, which in turn breeds anti-Semitism in the host population, and it is through this predictable cycle that Jews remain hyperaware of all changes in immigration policy throughout the world, since they rightly fear they might need to find a new country at any given moment.

This is on prominent display in recent news as President Donald J. Trump announces a plan to fight anti-Semitism on college campuses, and has, in turn for his trouble, been accused of anti-Semitism.

Trump recently signed an executive order defining Judaism as a Nationality. The stated purpose of this was to extend protections afforded to peoples on the basis of Nationality, which are not by default granted to religious groups. Specifically, it would deprive the anti-Israel “Boycott, Divest, and Sanction” or BDS movement, of public financing, by depriving educational institutions of federal subsidies, if they provided funds to such groups.

Some Jews, celebrated the news. Alan Dershowitz, a liberal Democrat, perhaps best known as Jeffrey Epstein’s  defense attorney, spoke from the White House to voice his support for the move. Moshe Hill, writing at the Daily Wire, laid out a familiar case for what he calls “The Jewish Nation”.

Among Jews, of course, there is a common saying… “Two Jews, three opinions”.

A group called Jewish Community Action said “This is horrifying. As American Jews, we will resist being defined as anything else. This is an empty, dishonest manipulation – the President wants to distract us from the truly violent white nationalism he has emboldened, and his own blatant antisemitism. We can’t let it work.”

Another Jewish group called If Not Now said “After a week of antisemitic speech, Trump is now signing an executive order to withhold money from college campuses that “tolerate anti-Israel movements.” This is not about keeping Jews safe. It’s just more antisemitism.”

In fairness to to the Jews, they have a point. The Jews survive largely by blending in amongst their host populations. They depend on being seen as “fellow Whites”, and maintaining their simultaneous separation by parading as a religious group, rather than as a race. If people realize that Jews are a foreign race, then they will be far less inclined to let them have such an outsized influence on the National economy, politics, and culture, as they currently enjoy.

Hitler noted in Mein Kampf;

From time immemorial. however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew “The Great Master of Lies”. Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth to prevail.

Now, for the joke.

This is precisely the moment that we have been waiting for, fellow Nazis.

You thought Trump had sold us out by pandering to the Jews, but this is the master stroke we faithful always knew was coming. This is 4D Chess at its finest, and soon, Trump really will be the King of Israel, a land which, like all others, is devoid of Jewish blood.

Trump spent years cultivating this opportunity. Years of dealing in New York Real Estate showed him the ways of the Jew. He has called them “Brutal killers,  not nice people at all” based on this experience. He knew, that if he tried to take the Jew head on, he would be crushed like every other Gentile who tried.

So, in Christ like sacrifice, he gave his sons and daughters to the Jew. He moved the US embassy to Jerusalem. He attacked his own supporters who criticized the Jews openly. He carried out Jewish foreign policy. He pandered to Jew’s homosexual minions, he set the Jew’s negro soldiers loose from our prisons, he embraced Jewish feminism, and so many more things, all in preparation for this moment.

Were Trump to name the Jews as a race without all of this preparation, he would be crushed. He had to set the stage, carefully, for many years, so that this revelation could be made to the American people, and to the world, as Hitler revealed to us so many years ago;

I gradually discovered that the Social Democratic Press was predominantly controlled by Jews. But I did not attach special importance to this circumstance, for the same state of affairs existed also in other newspapers. But there was one striking fact in this connection. It was that there was not a single newspaper with which Jews were connected that could be spoken of as National, in the meaning that my education and convictions attached to that word.

Making an effort to overcome my natural reluctance, I tried to read articles of this nature published in the Marxist Press; but in doing so my aversion increased all the more. And then I set about learning something of the people who wrote and published this mischievous stuff. From the publisher downwards, all of them were Jews. I recalled to mind the names of the public leaders of Marxism, and then I realized that most of them belonged to the Chosen Race–the Social Democratic representatives in the Imperial Cabinet as well as the secretaries of the Trades Unions and the street agitators. Everywhere the same sinister picture presented itself. I shall never forget the row of names–Austerlitz, David, Adler, Ellenbogen, and others. One fact became quite evident to me. It was that this alien race held in its hands the leadership of that Social Democratic Party with whose minor representatives I had been disputing for months past.

I was happy at last to know for certain that the Jew is not a German.

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Outlaw Conservative S01E043 – Left of Liberal

Years ago, I mocked a libertarian by the name of Jeffrey Tucker for his desire to “take back” the word “liberal” from the Left. The case he made was not entirely meritless, since “liberal” once meant something very similar to the common modern understanding of the word “libertarian”. I found his effort worthy of mockery, mostly because he had embraced numerous personality traits commonly associated with the Left, and his desire to embrace “liberalism” without shedding his libertarian credentials, seemed to be in keeping with a Leftward drift of the libertarian movement.

Mocking Jeffrey Tucker had become something of a hobby for me back then, ever since he launched his “brutalists vs. humanitarians” attack in the prior year.  He had arguably been one of the more noteworthy people to embrace the aforementioned Leftward drift of the movement, and I saw this as destructive well before I would have considered myself Right wing. Contemptible though that may have been, it would seem as though liberalism has been thoroughly abandoned by the Left in recent years, and the word is now Jeff’s for the taking.

Recently I have been even more annoyed by certain conservatives referring to the decidedly illiberal leanings of the modern Left  as “liberal”.

In a column published at TownHall.com, Derek Hunter laments about “The New Liberal Dictionary“. In this, he notes a trend which is by no means new, of Leftists altering the definition of language to suit their purposes. American, for example, has been completely disconnected from citizenship and its benefits and obligations. Today’s Left views “anyone with a foot on the land and a desire to stay” as an “American”. Science, once favored by liberals as they mocked the religious, is held in the contempt of the modern Left, to whatever extent it interferes with their superstitions surrounding things like gender, and climate. In that vein, “gender” has become more of an expansive black hole of nonsense than anything describing the human condition. “Racist/Sexist/Homophobic/etc” is similarly nebulous, and pertains more to a pressure tactic than any description of a person’s views. “Liberty” says Hunter, now means State provision of valuable resources and services.

At InfoWars,  for another example, Adan Salazar laments the “liberal” New York Times, trying to get Owen Shroyer banned from Twitter. Shroyer live-streamed himself disrupting House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment proceedings Monday morning, and though quite tame by the standard Left wing demonstrators set at the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings, the Times suddenly seemed to find congressional proceedings somehow sacrosanct.

Just a few years ago, even liberals who contemplated bans on so-called “hate speech” at least struggled with the implications of the State restricting the expression of its citizens. The “liberals” of that, now seemingly ancient, time, certainly would not have trusted giant multinational corporations to decide who could and could not participate in our political discourse.

Liberals, whatever their countless flaws, at least accepted the outcomes of elections. They generally rejected the sort of wanton political violence, wholeheartedly embraced by the Left today. If you called them socialists, they would scoff at the accusation. They would take offense at being called communists.

In stark contrast, the Left today embraces socialism in public, and all but admits that this itself is a thin cover for their fondness of communism. Elections, laws, and courts, have only so much legitimacy as they find convenient. They exude a sort of cherry picked anarchism, embracing the most draconian of State policies when it suits them, and rejecting the most routine of government activities as relics of “White Supremacy”.

The now forgotten apparent civility of liberals may have been little more than a thin veneer to cover their inner Leftist totalitarian, but that veil served some important purposes beyond swindling the public. It caused them to moderate their behavior and language in a way that reduced the destruction wrought by their wielding of power.

The mask is now off, and only time will tell if that turns out to be a positive thing.

On the upside, we may hope that this revelation causes the populace to reject their catastrophic influence on society.

On the downside, without that rejection, we can expect them to fulfill more promises than Trump, should they regain control over the levers of government.

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls, at 808-4-OUTLAW

 

Join us, this and every Wednesday from 5-7pm US Eastern time for another exciting episode of the Outlaw Conservative Podcast, where I look forward to hearing from you at 808-4-OUTLAW, or on our Discord Server at https://OutlawConservative.com/discord

On another note, have you tried the Brave Browser?

Follow Chris on TelegramParlerMinds – Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E090 – Swamp Clears Swamp

I’ve got a white pill for ya today.

Here at the Radical Agenda, we have been under the mistaken impression for the last few years that the Department of Justice was politicized during the Obama administration, and had turned the terrifying powers of the intelligence services to political purposes.

Fortunately for us, it turns out this was a false alarm. DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, a Jewish Obama appointee, has cleared James Comey, Andrew McCabe, and other senior officials of acting on political bias. As it turns out, the numerous “omissions” and “inaccuracies” in the application process, were just honest mistakes. The IG probe identified at least 17 “significant” errors in the FISA applications, and said they would launch a new audit into the FISA process.

Nothing to see here, goy. Move along.

Fortunately, US Attorney John Durham is not fooled by this whitewash. He released a statement saying

“I have the utmost respect for the mission of the Office of Inspector General and the comprehensive work that went into the report prepared by Mr. Horowitz and his staff. However, our investigation is not limited to developing information from within component parts of the Justice Department. Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”

Outside the US? He must be workin for the Russians!

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E089 – Intercourse of Human Events

Nancy Pelosi’s decision to begin her impeachment announcement with words from America’s Declaration of Independence, could not have been more fit to the purpose of the stunt.

That only makes sense, if you realize that removing the President from office by way of a Senate trial, is not the purpose of the exercise.

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another,” was far more genuine an utterance than the rest of her faux fondness for the founders. Pelosi clearly has no desire to keep a Republican form of government, and no matter how many times she quotes Benjamin Franklin, no informed observer will ever believe that she does. As far as Pelosi and her handlers are concerned, Thomas Jefferson was a slave raping hypocrite. On most days, their contempt for the Constitution and American History is hardly even disguised, and if you think any of them asked Jesus for help with this decision, then you better put that pipe down before you burn your fingers.

The Democrat Party almost seems to have been on a suicide mission for the last few years. They have been dismissed by many as having lost their minds for this. Trump derangement syndrome, run amok, has so warped warped their fragile psyches, it would seem, that they would sooner drive themselves off a cliff, than suffer 11 more months under Trump’s rule.

They have rejected the message so loudly delivered by voters in 2016, and embraced every unpopular idea imaginable, from decriminalizing theft to transgender supremacy. They have pledged to tear down our history, disarm our citizens, silence their critics, and invite a subsidized invasion of our lands. They would abolish the electoral college, pack the Supreme Court, end the Senate filibuster, and reshape our economy in ways that would frighten Karl Marx.

You’ve heard me say it a thousand times if you’re a regular listener. It almost seems like they are trying to lose the election.

Now, I am certain of it.

In an interview with Rolling Stone, Andrew Yang said “I’m pro-impeachment, but this is going to be a loser”.

Pelosi herself resisted the push toward impeachment, until powers not yet revealed to us, forced her hand.

Mainstream conservatives seem to think this is all done in error. Nobody actually believes that Trump will be removed from office by this impeachment process, but most mainstream conservatives seem to think this is a misguided attempt to weaken the President in the lead up to the 2020 election. The fact that it seems to be having the opposite effect, most think, is the result of a mere strategic blunder by the Democrat Party.

That would make sense if their militant wing had not cut their teeth in 2017. It would make sense if, after their crime wave started pissing off normal people, they told the masked flag burners to cool it. One could understand the theory if the Democrats condemned James Hodgkinson and Willem von Spronson, as loudly as they condemned the kids from Covington Catholic School. Needless to say, the exact opposite has been the case.

If impeachment was a political misstep, they had the option of settling for censure. Democrats could have campaigned on maintaining and growing their majority in the House, and gaining seats in the Senate, “just in case the President got re-elected”. They have been remarkably effective at thwarting Trump’s plans on immigration, and in just a few short years, their demographic replacement strategy would likely have had its desired effect, permanently rendering the targets of their ethnic enmity politically impotent, and ushering in an era of unmitigated Leftist hegemony, which would last until there was nothing left of the country to steal.

Instead, they have been unrelenting in their efforts to foment race war and revolution. They have condoned violence, attacked their constituents, flaunted the law, and generally acted as would a stunt candidate who had no interest in winning an election.

This is what one does “When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another,”

It is no mistake. These people have no more intention of winning the election than they do of removing the President through impeachment. They are all in on revolution at this point, and while their purported goal of a Utopian society free of want and restraint is clearly impossible, I fear they may be closer than most suspect, to a less publicized aim.

This is not a strategy for electoral or procedural victory. Not even a failed one. It is a pretext for lawlessness, and violence.  The false alarms of foreign interference are not news or opinion, but rather, war propaganda.

The lies in the press seem insane to those who are living through these times, because that is not who they are written for. It is not “fake news” so much as it is “fake history”.

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for White people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them others, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and decidedly unequal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold this truth to be self evident, that no man is created equal. The pursuit of such fantasies is hostile to Man’s nature, and as such, destructive toward his prosperity.

Rights, however defined or derived, are secured or destroyed by States, which are instituted amongst men, and derive what powers they may from the use of overwhelming force.

Whenever that force is turned to ends which run contrary to the nature of those it governs, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Democracy, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Europeans; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present Zionist Occupied Government, is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

They have refused their assent to laws, and chosen rather to selectively enforce those which may be to their advantage in a particular moment, only to let slip the dogs of anarchy when this seems more to their preference.

They have forbidden our jurisdictions to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, hauling before the kritarchy by force, any who dare to try and correct what ails our civilization.

They have rejected those outcomes of our elections which they find inconvenient, and endowed with powers beyond reason, those whose elections they find more satisfying.

They have peddled absurd notions of universalism across the boundaries of Race, Nation, Space, and Time, only to reject similar constraints which would, by necessity of reason, compel reciprocity upon themselves.

To facilitate our invasion and dissolution, they preach the virtues of freedom, tolerance, charity, and duty. In the same breath, to quell what resistance of necessity arises to this invasion and dissolution, they condemn precisely these same virtues.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: We have voted, run for elected office, distributed literature, spoken publicly, and lawfully assembled. Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Tribe whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of White people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Jewish overlords. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their International corporations to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our shared and, frequently unfortunate, history, to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of coexistence. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the White men of this Country, and speaking on behalf of our wives and daughters, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of this Race, solemnly publish and declare, That these White people are, and of Right ought to be a Free and Independent people, who may and shall establish amongst themselves a Government whose forms are in line with their nature and preferences; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to International Jewry, and that all political, economic, and cultural connection between them and International Jewry, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

 

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Outlaw Conservative S01E042 – Conspiracy Theories, Generally

There’s that phrase again. “Conspiracy Theory” has been uttered very frequently as of late, by desperate politicians, clinging to power like their lives depend on it.

We hear this often enough that I could, and soon will, address the issue of the phrase itself, devoid of the context of the moment. To connect today’s episode to the news of the day though, I’ll mention that several current events have me musing about the terminology.

Most prominent is the ongoing show trial in the United States House of Representatives, pertaining to the supposed impeachment of President Donald J. Trump. Democrats allege that Trump abused the power of his office to aid in his own reelection, and pursued a “debunked conspiracy theory” that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election.

To hear Representative Adam “Shifty” Schiff tell it, this preposterous claim is a product of Russian spies, devoid of any tether to the physical universe. To even mention this possibility is evidence of outright treason against the United States, as only one in the employ of the Kremlin would dare to speak such subversive filth.

Curiously, Schiff’s outrage over conspiracy theories seems quite narrow. No such indignation was forthcoming when Hillary Clinton alleged, sans evidence, that Tulsi Gabbard and Jill Stein were “Russian assets”. Van Jones remains a Democrat in good standing, despite signing a petition by 9/11 truthers. Schiff himself peddled “Russia collusion” for months, falsely claiming in televised interviews that he was privy to evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election. No such evidence was forthcoming, after years long investigations by the Special Counsel’s office, the House of Representatives, and the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Whatever the case, a “conspiracy theory” is just that. It is a theory, about more than one individual, conspiring to do some illicit thing. All investigations involving more than one suspect, are, by definition, conspiracy theories.

Despite the plain meaning of the language, the phrase, in common parlance, has become synonymous with falsehood. It is a common utterance in news discussions “this is not a conspiracy, this actually happened” as if the two things were mutually exclusive. The FBI has recently classified “conspiracy theory-driven domestic extremists” as a terror threat, as if they were trying to mess with such “extremists” by confirming their worst fears. Being branded a “conspiracy theorist” is mere millimeters below being branded a “racist” in today’s political discourse, and for this reason, people would sooner deny the obvious truth, than bear the cost of espousing such unpopular views.

Perhaps the most common complaint about so-called “conspiracy theories” is that they are not true, by definition. To make this assertion, the person making it must necessarily have studied every conspiracy theory, and deemed all of them to be false. Since their premise is usually that we shouldn’t even be discussing these things, I find this terribly unlikely. With the Alex Jones program airing seven days a week, and InfoWars.com pumping out articles every single day, even the most dedicated conspiracy theorist would have his hands full trying to confirm or debunk all of them. Add to this dozens if not hundreds of other conspiracy theory websites, radio shows, and podcasts, and the task of finding out about all them, much less researching them, becomes quite the chore. Someone who dismisses an entire class of information, just because they call it a “conspiracy theory” is certainly not spending nearly that much time researching all of these ideas.

Granted, some of these things are not entirely supported by reality.

One of the more ridiculous claims I’ve heard made is that juice boxes are turning children into homosexuals. Then again, the idea just sounds so preposterous, that I’m not bothering to research it. I’d be willing to bet if you did research it, you would find some confirmed evidence that could lead one in that direction, but reaching the asserted conclusion is not necessarily supported by fact.

Take “chemtrails” as another example. There is evidence to suggest that it has been proposed by government agents and corporations to spray chemicals into the sky for “geoengineering”, and people have found elevated levels of certain chemicals in the soil in some areas. From these very real facts, people jump to the insane conclusion that every line in the sky is a radical depopulation agenda.

“Conspiracy theories” pertaining to the attacks of September 11th 2001 abound, some of which contradict one another. Some people say a plane didn’t even hit the pentagon, it was a missile. Some people say the planes were guided by remote control. Some people say there were explosives in the twin towers, some say thermite. I’m honestly not claiming to know the answer, but I would say that the most ridiculous conspiracy theory I’ve heard about September 11th is the “official” 9/11 Commission Report. Truth is the first casualty of any war, and to assume the “War on Terror” is any exception is lunacy.

Take the Boston Marathon bombing for another example. Some people claim there to have been “crisis actors” who came in and staged the whole thing. I personally find this a little bit ridiculous, since even if the government did stage the attack, they would have no problem murdering a bunch of innocent people in the process. That’s kinda what governments do, after all. The one absurd claim, is no reason to dismiss the fact that bomb drills describing exactly what happened were ongoing when it went down, or the many contradictions of the “official story” that have been pointed out by “conspiracy theorists”. Especially when it leads to something as insane as martial law in Boston, there’s plenty of reason to be skeptical about the narrative that leads to something like that.

For these reasons and others, I think dismissing “conspiracy theories” as untrue, is just plain bogus. One could make the criticism that conspiracy theorists should be a bit more careful in their positive assertions, but I think they have done a lot of extremely important work in exposing government lies.

A common criticism lobbed, especially by the “peace is the way” crowd, is that conspiracy theories scare people, and that fear is unproductive. I couldn’t disagree more. Fear is a healthy instinct. If you find yourself stranded in a jungle somewhere, and you see a pack of hyenas killing something, fear may lead you to walk in the other direction, and that’s a good thing.

Likewise, governments have murdered 260 million of their own citizens in the last century, by some measurements, so people who are not afraid of it, concern me. Government is arguably the number one preventable cause of human death and suffering in the world, and I couldn’t think of a better thing to be terrified of. If showing people shocking documentaries about government atrocities and exposing government lies helps lead people to the conclusion that government is a terrifyingly violent and evil institution, I’d have a hard time coming up with a better possible outcome.

People should be afraid of government! It kills people! Even the most anti-conspiracy conservative should be able to understand that.

Another common critique is that, true or not, one hurts the public perception of their favored political viewpoint by wading into this category of ideas.

This one really burns me, especially because it’s not just limited to “conspiracy theories”. If you don’t want to be associated with exposing government lies and atrocities, then by all means, don’t. For those of us who value this though, you have no more a right to claim ownership over a “movement” than anybody else. This “you’re hurting the movement” stuff is lobbed at every faction by every other faction, who thinks everybody should be doing what they’re doing. The whole point of opposing the Left, is to understand that we don’t all do the same things, that we all have different motivations, and that different people respond differently to different stimuli.

I certainly don’t agree with a lot of things Alex Jones has said. Yet, I would have to be dumb, deaf, and blind to think that he hasn’t done more to diminish the credibility of the “establishment”, than every loud mouth I’ve ever known, combined, short of Donald Trump.

I would also venture to say, that Jones, and others like him, have substantially improved the quality of their reporting over the years. This may be a mere consequence of the actual news of the day, becoming far more frightening, than the scarcely plausible things genuine “conspiracy nuts” used to fret about, just a few short years ago. Would we even have any concept of just how tragically screwed up our country has become, were it not for such “conspiracy theorists” daring to risk their credibility by digging up the rabbit holes?

I would think it unlikely…

So, on the whole,  I tend to think conspiracy theories do more good than harm. While some, such as the Russia hoax, certainly damage our political discourse, others, such as demanding a more plausible explanation for Jeffery Epstein’s untimely demise, warrant considerable scrutiny.

The key to unlocking their benefits, and mitigating their potential for harm, as I see it, lies in a continuum of information. Along this continuum, credibility is granted or denied according to the reputations of those purporting such theories to be plausible. Obscure producers must listen to crackpots, respectable producers must listen to the obscure, and those in proximity to power must consider the insights of the respectable, combine this with their unique access to information, and act on those theories which turn out to have a basis in fact.

The threat to this continuum is the allegation of “conspiracy theory” itself. The crackpots remain crackpots, with no capacity to improve the quality of their information, if nobody will ask a question which might put them in the same social category as a crackpot. Obscure producers who avoid the crackpots, and instead mimic the utterances of the respectable for want of similar status, add nothing to our discourse, and leave the respectables without any challenge to their own narrative dominance.

Thus the accusation of “conspiracy theorist” is itself, something of a conspiracy. When powerful people shout “How dare you accuse me of conspiring? I will crush you!” one might reliably profit from betting that the threatening figure is, indeed, conspiring. The louder the denials and condemnations, the more frenzied the effort to discredit and silence the source, the more credible the allegation becomes, in my eyes.

 

Join us, this and every Wednesday from 5-7pm US Eastern time for another exciting episode of the Outlaw Conservative Podcast, where I look forward to hearing from you at 808-4-OUTLAW, or on our Discord Server at https://OutlawConservative.com/discord

On another note, have you tried the Brave Browser?

Follow Chris on TelegramParlerMinds – Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E088 – Paging Malarkey

Disgraced FBI lawyer Lisa Page, best known for having sex with a married co-worker, and abusing the power of her office to assist Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election, has recently come out of hiding. She sought to defend what remains of her name, from what she laughably sees as unfair attacks on her by the President of the United States.

The first hint that she is every bit as bad as you think she is, comes from the publication carrying the interview.

The Daily Beast, which is, in reality, little more than an Antifa blog.

Page is obviously somebody that almost any media outlet would love to speak with. She could have had a softball interview with glowing commentary from the New York Times, the Washington Post, or any other newspaper. She could have gone live on CNN or MSNBC, and been treated as a hero for her assaults on marriage, democracy, and the rule of law. She chose the Daily Beast, specifically, for their low journalistic standards, and what one might safely bet was an established agreement to ask absolutely zero difficult questions.

Instead of asking Page anything meaningful, Molly Jong-Fast spends all 3500+ words assuring the reader that this FBI lawyer could not possibly have done anything even remotely suspicious, let alone illegal. The real problem is that conspiracy theorist in the White House, and the “harassment” Page has suffered for no other reason than being a woman. It almost goes without saying, that they blamed Russia for the scandal, and adamantly denied that Ukraine could possibly have made the slightest effort to impact the 2016 election.

Speaking of Ukraine, their human resources director, Joe Biden, is traveling about Iowa on a “No Malarkey” tour. Given what we know about Joe Biden, we can be quite certain that “malarkey” would be a rather charitable term to describe whatever nonsense he is feeding Iowa caucus goers. Perhaps he’ll host a town hall meeting with MS-13 members, and introduce them as a “courageous group of Americans“.

I suppose, like Lisa Page, he figures he can get away with saying whatever he wants, thanks to a cooperative media. For a brief moment, it seemed like the Internet would loosen their stranglehold on the flow of information, but that dream came to an abrupt end when people figured out that free speech invariably results in anti-Semitism. Once the Left saw how easy it was to silence so-called “Nazis”, they obviously had to see how far they could leverage that power, and they have yet to find a limit.

Most recently, it was announced that Google and YouTube have taken down over 300 advertisements by the Trump campaign.

60 Minutes reviewed the archive to learn more about President Trump’s problematic political ads. We found that over 300 video ads were taken down by Google and YouTube, mostly over the summer, for violating company policy. But the archive doesn’t detail what policy was violated. Was it copyright violation? A lie or extreme inaccuracy? Faulty grammar? Bad punctuation? It’s unclear. The ads determined to be offending are not available to be screened. We found very little transparency in the transparency report.

CBS did not seem interested in finding out if any Democrats had similar problems. They probably just operated under the safe assumption that this was a narrowly focused enforcement of real or imagined policy violations, specifically designed to damage the Trump campaign, and posted the story as more of a celebration than as anything resembling news. This is something you might expect from CBS, but I was somewhat surprised to see that PJMedia, TownHall, and Breitbart, all similarly failed to ask this obvious question.

I decided to check for myself, and I found more or less what one would expect. Biden has had no ads removed whatsoever. Warren has had some ads removed, which usually came in spurts, indicating perhaps an effort to run the same violation multiple times before moving on, but nowhere near as many as Trump.

Even if it were done perfectly even, the impact is obvious, and no sane person doubts Google’s intent. The Democrats have the entirety of the media behind them, and do not require digital advertising in the way Trump and other Republicans do.

Google announced an update to their advertising policy last month, which limited the targeting of political advertising. Trump and the Republican Party condemned the policy change, noting the obviousness of the intent.

Twitter, as you’ve surely heard, announced that they would stop selling political ads altogether. Well, not exactly, of course. They just won’t sell ads to political campaigns, PACs, or 501(c)4 groups pursuing legislative or electoral outcomes. If Planned Parenthood wants to flood Twitter with abortion propaganda, and that propaganda links to other material on immigration, that’s perfectly fine with Jack.

Maybe that’s why Jack decided he’s going to spend much of 2020 in Africa.

 

 

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E087 – Blank Friday

It’s that time of year again. Shoppers are out chasing illusive bargains on crap they don’t need, for people they don’t like. For the privilege of being the first to empty their wallets and incur interest bearing debt, they have resorted to violence and hoax threats.

That’s not very interesting, so let’s talk about Jews, instead.

You might recall from a recent episode, how our friends at SaidTheJew.com had uncovered some observations about the impeachment sham. Specifically, the demographic overrepresentation of Jews in the process, became impossible even for the Jews themselves to ignore. The more names that get dropped, the more this pronounced this phenomenon becomes.

But, there is a reason SaidTheJew.com has their tagline set as “If we said it, they would call us Nazis”.

The Jerusalem Post proves the point with this headline “Antisemitic pastor calls Donald Trump impeachment ‘Jew coup’

It almost goes without saying, the Pastor was quickly banned from YouTube for pointing this out.

“That’s the way the Jews work, they are deceivers, they plot, they lie, they do whatever they have to do to accomplish their political agenda,” Wiles said on what he calls the “Godcast.”

“This is a coup led by Jews to overthrow the constitutionally elected president of the United States and it’s beyond removing Donald Trump, it’s removing you and me. That’s what’s at the heart of it. … I am going to tell you, Church of Jesus Christ, you’re next. Get it through your head! They’re coming for you. There will be a purge. That’s the next thing that happens when Jews take over a country, they kill millions of Christians.”

Right now, the channel appears to be back online, but with few videos and only going back two weeks. (Update, the ban was just for one week.)

That wasn’t the only side project of ours that recently made headlines. Our friends over at BlacksHateFags.com have been diligently pointing out the real reason that Pete Booty Judge will never be president, which, as the name implies, is because Blacks Hate Fags. This wisdom made its way into the national discourse when Andy Ngo pointed out to Chelsea Clinton that “The US is one of the safest countries for trans people. The murder rate of trans victims is actually lower than that for cis population. Also, who is behind the murders? Mostly black men.”

This bit of obvious truth was too “hateful” for Twitter, and they gave him a 12 hour ban, after forcing him to remove the “hate fact” Tweet.

 

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Outlaw Conservative S01E041 – Turkey Shoot

Here at the Outlaw Conservative, we tend to pride ourselves on rejecting the oppressive doctrines of political correctness.

This is not to say that we are heartless, however. We are not entirely unconscious of the disparities which exist between demographic groups, nor are we devoid of sympathy for the hardships that some of those disparities entail. So, as we launch this Thanksgiving Eve special episode of the show, we would first like to pause for a moment of contemplation.

Americans often get wrapped up in certain themes of this holiday. Turkey, pumpkin pie, football, doorbuster sales, and inner city single moms fighting over discounted flat screens.

But there is more to it than that, of course.

Consider how tough this day is for some Americans. Elizabeth Warren, for example. Her family was once made up entirely of noble savages who lived in harmony with the Earth. They welcomed immigrants from Europe, and taught them how to plant fish. In return for their kindness, they were nearly wiped out by interbreeding, superior technology, and infectious diseases. The ravages of uncontrolled immigration were so devastating to Warren’s tribe, that the Massachusetts Senator is now only 1/1024th Native American.

This dissolution of Native lineage and culture has been devastating in so many ways. Not only has our fashion been largely deprived the benefit of feathers, but the cost of housing has skyrocketed as we replaced cost efficient teepees, with permanent structures that require constant and costly maintenance. Peace pipes have been replaced, first by cigars, then cigarettes, and now by deadly vaping devices. Absent those peace pipes, we have been cursed with mass shootings, which would never have been possible, had we stuck to tomahawks and arrows. The replacement of wampum with Federal Reserve Notes has resulted in business cycles, inflation, and fractional reserve banking.

Smallpox blankets and firewater remind us of how devastating free trade was to the Native Americans. Lessons which, had we remembered, might have saved us from Chinese fentanyl and antifreeze toothpaste.

Perhaps it is overdue that we abandon our false narratives of this time period.

Fortunate then, perhaps, that Education Week and PBS are telling the story of public school teachers helping students to “unlearn” the “myth” of Thanksgiving.

 

Join us, this and every Wednesday from 5-7pm US Eastern time for another exciting episode of the Outlaw Conservative Podcast, where I look forward to hearing from you at 808-4-OUTLAW, or on our Discord Server at https://OutlawConservative.com/discord

On another note, have you tried the Brave Browser?

Follow Chris on TelegramParlerMinds – Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E086 – White Pill Roundup

On a recent episode of Outlaw Conservative, I remarked about how even Democrats don’t believe their own media anymore. I was somewhat black pilled about this at the time, because it does illustrate a somewhat frightening phenomenon in that, even though they know the media is lying, they don’t seem to mind all that much.

The glimmer of hope recently visited upon my inbox by Rasmussen, shows that while a troubling number of people believe America is on the brink of civil war, most of those concerned about political violence are well aware who poses the real threat to this country.

Voters see a bigger threat from President Trump’s opponents over policy issues than from his supporters if Democrats succeed in removing him from office. One-in-three still see the threat of civil war in the near future.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 53% of Likely U.S. Voters are concerned that Trump’s impeachment and removal from office will lead to violence, with 24% who are Very Concerned. 

But 59% are concerned that those opposed to Trump’s policies will resort to violence, including 34% who are Very Concerned.

Over 60% of Republicans fear violence from both those opposed to the president’s policies and those who support him if he is removed from office.

But Democrats aren’t nearly as worried about Trump’s supporters which helps explain their strong support for the highly partisan impeachment effort. While 40% of Democrats are Very Concerned that those opposed to Trump’s policies will resort to violence, just 18% feel that way about his supporters if the president is removed from office.

Among voters who Strongly Approve of the job Trump is doing, however, 42% are Very Concerned that his removal from office will lead to violence. Only 17% of those who Strongly Disapprove of his job performance agree.

These polling results show a staggering disconnect between those polled and what the media says. The average Democrat seems to have figured out that the people wearing masks and setting limousines on fire, aren’t quite the flower picking hippies that the media makes them out to be. The drumfire of nonsense about “White Supremacist Terrorism” seems to have faded from their minds, despite the best efforts of propagandists to elevate this narrative.

I am somewhat unsurprised to see that Republicans fear violence from “both sides”. It’s all that “fair and balanced” Fox News coverage infecting their minds with the ridiculous idea that Democrats might actually be victims from time to time. They’ll figure it out eventually, I hope.

What I find most interesting, is that the Left fears Left wing violence, not if Trump wins re-election, but rather, if Trump is removed from office by way of impeachment.

This shows a really profound understanding of how these people actually operate. Leftists are not mere hostage takers, who release the victim when they get their ransom. They escalate when they win, far more than when they lose. Their insatiable thirst for chaos and destruction, is not quenched by the waters of victory.

It would be more analogous to say that victory to them is like drinking seawater. Their throats sore from screaming, their mouths dry from marijuana and poor dental hygiene, they initially welcome that first gulp of salty refreshment, only to feel the thirst get worse by the second. They imbibe until their stomachs are full, and remain perplexed at how nothing at all seems to satisfy their discomfort and anxiety.

Rather than ditch the Brawndo and give Poland Spring a chance, they call Poland a racist country, and curse the tyranny of their own biology.

Fortunately, they are terribly unlikely to get so much as a shot of saline out of the impeachment sham.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 18% of Likely U.S. Voters think Trump will be impeached before serving his full term in office. Seventeen percent (17%) felt that way in September, down from a high of 29% when Rasmussen Reports first asked this question in late December 2017.

Forty-five percent (45%) still believe the president will be reelected in 2020, basically unchanged in surveys over the past year. Twenty-six percent (26%) say he will be defeated by the Democratic nominee, but this finding has been trending down from 33% in late July to 28% two months ago.

Meanwhile, 46% of voters think the House hearing should be expanded to look at the involvement of Biden and his son Hunter in Ukrainian political affairs. Forty-three percent (43%) disagree, while 11% are undecided.

Predictably, 68% of Republicans and unaffiliated voters by a 48% to 39% margin think the impeachment hearings should include the Bidens, but just 25% of Democrats agree.

This, again, is despite non-stop Teddy Ruxpin-esque chanting by TV talking heads, about “bombshell” testimony before the House Intelligence Committee. If you were a regular CNN or MSNBC viewer, and you were dumb enough to believe what you were being told, it would seem a forgone conclusion that Trump was about to be removed from office in time for Christmas.

Under those circumstances, the next thing on your to-do list would be to start coming up with some excuse to remove Pence. This would not be much of a challenge for Democrats, because they would simply accuse him of homophobia, and insist that this is a high crime by the standard of our living breathing constitution, which needless to say, always breathes in the direction Democrats wish the wind would blow.

And speaking of our ever changing constitution, Ruth Bader Ginsburg is basically a real life version of Weekend at Bernie’s at this point, and I don’t mean a sleepover at Senator Sanders’ place. The 86-year-old Supreme Court Justice found herself in the hospital again over the weekend. She was discharged from Johns Hopkins on Sunday, two days after she was admitted for experiencing chills and fever. Her symptoms are reported to have subsided after “intravenous antibiotics and fluids” treatment.

Since her appointment in 1993 by President Bill Clinton, she has had four occurrences of cancer, including two in the past year. In August, Ginsburg finished radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer. In December, she had surgery to remove cancerous nodules from her left lung — discovered only after she fell and fractured three ribs. Ginsburg also took a mid-November absence from a public session of the court because of a stomach bug.

But antibiotics and fluids, whether delivered by IV or by enema, are not going to keep this constitutional cancer alive forever. If Trump gets a second term, it is difficult to imagine she will still be sabotaging our Court system by the time Alexandria Ocasio Cortez is eligible to seek the presidency.

 

 

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E085 – Doolittle’s Return

We had Curt Doolittle on as our guest for Radical Agenda Stage 5 Episode 15.

With Ukraine in the news, I thought Curt might be an interesting fellow to talk to. Curt has spent some time in the country, and even offered to be Donald Trump’s ambassador to Ukraine after the election. While I remain somewhat skeptical of Doolittle’s diplomatic skills, he probably would have done a better job of carrying out administration policy than Marie Yovanovitch.

Curt is also a lot more comfortable talking honestly about Jewish influence on things than anyone who would ever be called to testify before Congress, so I suspect this will be a great talk.

 

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading