Radical Agenda S05E079 – Murderberg’s House of Horrors

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently gave a talk at Georgetown University, supposedly reiterating his dedication to freedom of expression, in a world careening toward illiberal constraints on thought, word, and deed. The speech came on the heels of widespread hysteria over his meeting with such controversial figures on the Right as Tucker Carlson, and Byron York.

After seemingly discovering the obvious truth that censorious Left wing fanatics can never be satisfied, Zuckerberg now appears to be attempting to bring his company back from the brink of uselessness, by seeking some limits on the push to silence everyone the outrage mob sets their sights on. Presumably with some concern for the backlash which will ensue after a Republican landslide in 2020, Zuckerberg drew the line at deplatforming the President of the United States.

Simultaneously, he doubled down on his dedication to stamping out so called “hate speech” and “terrorist propaganda” and eliminating “foreign interference” in American elections, which to the careful observer, means only that the catastrophic policies of recent years will continue unabated. Politicians can lie on his platform, favored causes can break the laws of their jurisdictions, violence against disfavored groups can be promoted, but private citizens who speak out of turn, or who utter truths which inconvenience the egalitarian narrative, will continue to be suppressed for as long as governments permit such manipulation of the National conversation.

One need not be a statistician to see the foolishness of this.

A little over two years ago, hundreds of White Nationalists attempted to hold a permitted demonstration in Charlottesville, Virginia. They were set upon by violent communist agitators, who had announced, well in advance, their intent to violently disrupt the demonstration. This was a practice they had been engaged in for months prior, so much so that they became the subject of a DHS memo warning of the impacts. In the wake of that unprovoked assault, Facebook and other social media platforms, as well as PayPal and other payment systems, silenced and bankrupted the victims of this and other such attacks, while leaving the perpetrators free to celebrate their victory, and to plan and promote further such crimes.

Prior to this, how many “racist” mass murderers did you know the names of? At least in the United States, just one, most likely. Dylann Roof. Years prior to that, there was Anders Behring Breivik in Norway, but there was no serious talk of an “International White Supremacist Terror Threat” outside of the most reality detached Left wing ideological circles.

Well prior to Roof’s crime, one could get a 30 day ban from Facebook for relatively minor transgressions of the Leftist narrative. I personally had been banned for comparing Barack Obama to Hitler, well before I realized what an insult this was to Adolf Hitler, as one of countless examples. During a time when I still thought racism to be a very bad thing, I was banned from Twitter for calling somebody a nigger, as a joke. Lots of people knew, on some level, that discreet efforts to discourage dissent were well underway at all the major tech platforms, but we continued to advocate our ideas, peacefully, because we saw an opportunity, however slim, to spread our ideas without resorting to violence.

It was only AFTER our permitted demonstration was shut down by criminals, that people began to lose hope. It was only AFTER these dramatically ramped up attempts to silence the concerns of the Right, that Robert Bowers said “Screw your optics, I’m going in” and shot up a synagogue. It was only AFTER Alex Jones got kicked off of Facebook, that Brenton Tarrant killed dozens of Muslims in a New Zealand mosque. It was only AFTER Laura Loomer and Milo Yiannopoulos were deplatformed, that Patrick Crusius shot up a Walmart. It was only AFTER the “Okay” hand sign became a symbol of “White Supremacy” that Stephan Balliet said “the root of all these problems, is the Jew” and opened fire outside a synagogue, in Halle, Germany.

In a speech at the White House, given in 1962, President John F. Kennedy famously said that “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”

That bit of wisdom pre-dated the birth of Mark Zuckerberg, and well before President Kennedy himself had been born, it was enshrined in the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States. It was no coincidence that it was followed immediately by our second amendment, guaranteeing to our citizens, the right to keep and bear arms.

I had titled Episode 77 of stage 5 “Listen” and addressed the senseless rampage of Stephen Balliet. Pressed for time, I failed to fully convey what I meant by this, and surely, I’ll similarly fail today, because the enormity of this defies even my enviable mastery of the English language, as well as the time constraints imposed by my schedule.

Our opposition insists that our concerns have no legitimacy. Convinced of their own moral superiority, or perhaps more accurately, unconcerned with morality, they demand our unconditional silence, and surrender. They consider their violence to be a legitimate form of political expression, and our political expression to be an illegitimate form of violence. If our side wins the election, the government has no legitimacy, but if they win, it has omnipotent powers beyond those described in the Constitution. When the Supreme Court favors their views, it is infallible, but if even the slightest prospect of a challenge to those views arises in the makeup of the Court, it must be fundamentally altered to prevent such challenges. Borders are illegitimate and we are all to be citizens of the world, until a foreign government whose views they oppose buys some Facebook ads, at which point we are to become a hermit kingdom, isolated from unapproved foreign opinions.

No wonder Zuckerberg is more willing to censor “hate speech” than political dishonesty. Dishonesty is what the status quo thrives on, and “hate speech” is the truth which threatens to set us free.

But truth, however seemingly disadvantaged at any given moment, has a certain unique power to it. Like water, it can be directed, shaped, or tainted, but not stopped.

In the bible, water is said to have drowned most life on Earth. Water carved out the grand canyon. Water has destroyed homes, and entire cities, in our lifetimes, before our eyes, more times than most of us could count. Man has built dams, sewers, canals, reservoirs, and vast networks of pipes for the delivery of water. We have built rafts, boats, submarines, and even floating houses, in a never ending effort to bring ourselves into harmony with the simultaneously lethal and life giving properties of water, but we dare not try to do away with it, for knowledge of both the futility of the pursuit, and our we need of it to survive.

Like water, truth will only submit to man’s demands so long as they are reasonable. It may similarly take the path of least resistance, but recall that when water determined the path of least resistance was to carve through 147 trillion cubic feet of rock, we got the Grand Canyon. When water determined the path of least resistance was through the lungs of every living thing on Earth, only Noah and the passengers of his Ark survived. With that in mind, it should come as no surprise that when truth determines the path of least resistance to be criminal violence, murder, and mayhem, that this is precisely the course it will follow.

If some billionaire tech company decided to build a dam along some river, and the resulting flood drowned the surrounding populations, would we curse the water, and demand those companies build more dams? Would we declare the water a terrorist threat? Would we shut down trade schools which taught plumbing? Would we ban sprinkler systems, showers, and sinks, and tell mankind to survive on Brawndo alone?

If Mark Zuckerberg had his way, we most certainly would, and the predictably lethal results would very much resemble that which we are watching unfold before our eyes today.

Less than two months after Robert Bowers opened fire on a Pittsburgh synagogue, a man named Gordon Danning, History Research Fellow at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, published a paper titled “Is the Cure Worse Than the Disease?: Censorship of Hate Speech May Well Increase Violence“, at the Nevada Law Journal Forum. The paper had been in the works prior to the massacre, and relied entirely on data collected well before the crime.

His question has no doubt been answered over the last 12 months. While Leftists used to rely almost entirely on fabrications for evidence of so called “hate crimes”, the circumstances they have designed through their censorious efforts, have created the only sort of environment that could lead White men to become the very caricature they made of us in earlier fictions. Seeing the world their ancestors built, descend into barbarism before their eyes, in near perfect, and clearly causal, correlation with their dwindling numbers, they have lashed out in previously unthinkable ways.

Today, we may consider ourselves fortunate that it is only those on the fringes. Men with nothing to lose, and nothing to gain, throwing their lives away, in seemingly senseless acts of violence that have no hope of altering our futures. But as the walls close in, and these warning shots are ignored, one may reliably profit by betting on the sense of dread and urgency that pushed those men over the edge, taking hold in the minds of more capable actors.

Should the truth see no better path than to carve through the Jews, then the truth will do to them, what the Colorado River did to the Colorado Plateau. No algorithm, no erasure, no boycott, no mob, no act of the legislature, no executive order, and surely no disingenuous speech professing devotion to the opposite of one’s demonstrated behavior, will be able to stop it.

Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey, Susan Wojcicki, Sundar Pichai, Matthew Prince, Dan Schulman, Patrick Collison, Jeff Bezos, and other tech titans who have taken it upon themselves to silence their political opposition, bear greater responsibility for past and future bloodshed than the weapons used, or even the killers themselves. They have had every reason to see the causal relationship between their acts, and the lives lost, and when this becomes obvious to a large enough portion of the population, they would do well to hope some shred of the US Constitution remains, because when that happens, the only hope they’ll have of avoiding repercussion, will be the the prohibitions on ex post facto laws, and bills of attainder.

 

 

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Outlaw Conservative S01E038 – Dining With Zuck

Last night, a dozen Democrats did their best impressions of CNN opinion hosts, competing for the chance to lose next year’s presidential election to Donald Trump. I watched every minute of the entire spectacle, and under normal circumstances, would consider it my professional obligation to provide some post debate analysis on today’s episode.

Today’s Democrat Party, however, does not warrant much in the way of analysis. The strategy being deployed has nothing to do with actual policy, and has instead dwindled to what may as well have been grunts and clicks, designed to appeal only to unthinking emotional responses. This exercise in non-reality will be the politics of our future, if immigration is not slowed, and American birthrates are not increased, but the Democrats have, much to their detriment, jumped the gun. The collective IQ of the Nation has not yet dropped so far as to warrant this sort of campaigning, and as a result, Donald Trump is all but guaranteed victory in 2020.

The smart people have already figured this out. Mark Zuckerberg, however countless his flaws, is a smart person.

Seeing the writing on the wall, Zuckerberg has been confidentially meeting with conservative personalities, including Tucker Carlson. This revelation has driven Leftists absolutely insane, resulting in, amongst other things, the hashtag #DeleteFacebook recently trending on Twitter.

Little is known about the contents of their talks, but one imagines it has a great deal to do with Left wing bias in the platform’s staffing and content moderation policies. Republicans have been pointing out that the immunity provisions of the Communications Decency Act, only exempt neutral platforms from lawsuits over content. If Facebook and other social media companies are going to be in the business of content moderation, this in fact makes them publishers, who thus ought to be held legally responsible for the content on their platforms. Seeing the law applied in this way would either put Facebook out of business, or cause them to dramatically alter the way they do business, in the blink of an eye.

It has become obvious that the Trump administration will do nothing to rectify this situation before next year’s election, and so far it has seemed that the search and social media platforms have placed all their eggs in the singular basket, of aiding a Democrat victory in 2020. This path is fraught with perils, for a number of reasons.

Joe Biden’s increasingly obvious senility is becoming quite a burden for media propagandists to cover up. Narrative guidance can only take a party so far in a world plagued by live television and social media, however rigorous the censorship. Adam Schiff’s sham Trump impeachment inquiry, is also having the unfortunate side effect of drawing attention to the high priced influence peddling of Biden’s son Hunter, and compelling the thinking voter to view Biden as the very incarnation of Washington corruption. The “woke” hostility towards while males, particularly older, heterosexual ones, does not play well with the rapacious radicalism of the most verbose elements of the Democrat base.

While the RealClearPolitics average of Democrat Primary polling currently still gives Biden a 6 point lead, Warren leads Biden in Iowa and New Hampshire, the first caucus and primary states in the country, respectively. Success begets success, and it seems unlikely that Biden’s claim of electability would withstand two such substantial victories by Warren.

“The Squad” as they are known, far Left freshman Democrat members of the House, have endorsed the campaign of Bernie Sanders. While at first glance, this would seem to deprive the Warren’s sails of much needed wind, it also has the, perhaps intentional, effect of shielding Warren from accusations of being too extreme for voters in the general election. With Sanders well behind both Warren and Biden, trailing the latter by double digits, and given his recent heart attack, it seems unlikely the more forthcoming socialist is going to come within striking distance of the nomination. Once Sanders comprehends the futility of continuing, it is all but certain that he will put his weight behind Warren. From there, all future contents will be mere formalities, and Warren will have secured the nomination.

With Warren as the nominee, Big Tech will be met with the horrifying prospect of living up to their purported values. Warren has pledged to break up their monopolies, which would simultaneously devastate their financial prospects, and substantially increase the challenge of censoring the Internet. Warren is likely being profoundly disingenuous about this promise, but the Big Tech monopolists know all too well that policy is far less a concern than the direction of the National conversation. Even if Warren is bought off, and declines to break up Big Tech once elected, as one might safely bet, the thought police have very good reason to prevent such ideas from ever taking hold.

Suppressing one campaign promise of the Democrat nominee’s platform would border on impossible. To suppress the idea of breaking up their companies, they would have to suppress the candidate promoting the idea.

If Warren backtracks on the promise after winning the primary, it will harm her in the general.

Either move would help Trump.

If Trump secures a second term, and Republicans maintain their Senate majority, the impact on the judiciary will be so far reaching that few could fully comprehend the long term ramifications. Trump has already appointed a greater percentage of federal judges than any President since George Washington, and four more years of this practice would fundamentally reshape many of the lower courts. Ruth Bader Ginsburg keeps falling down and having cancer scares, making it appear unlikely that she will be capable of waiting out a Two Term Trump Presidency.  The Left’s fondness for kritarchy could thus soon backfire, leaving the lawfare battlefield solidly in favor of the Right, for the first time in recent memory.

If Zuckerberg has figured this out, one must imagine that other tech giants cannot be far behind. Those who are more interested in their continued success, than the approval of vocal transgender activists, will soon have to come to grips with the reality of our increasingly illiberal political landscape.

 

 

Join us, this and every Wednesday from 5-7pm US Eastern time for another exciting episode of the Outlaw Conservative Podcast, where I look forward to hearing from you at 808-4-OUTLAW, or on our Discord Server at https://OutlawConservative.com/discord

On another note, have you tried the Brave Browser?

Follow Chris on TelegramParlerMinds – Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E078 – The Meme War Heats Up

The Leftist media is in hysterics over a YouTube video in which Donald Trump’s head is superimposed on a character from a fight scene in a movie. In it, Donald Trump walks into “The Church of Fake News,” wherein all the churchgoers have the logos of media organizations, or the faces of his political enemies, superimposed on them. As per their pattern and practice, the fake news enemies of the people, and their subversive Democrat allies, attempt to kill the President. Unfortunately for these assassins, the President happens to be in possession of a pistol, and superhuman combat abilities, which he uses to lay waste to the whole lot of them.

The Press, suddenly aware of the serious impacts media can have on people’s behavior, are now in full panic mode, concerned this will somehow cause people to go out and murder reporters.

The informed observer has to suspect that this is the voice of a guilty conscience speaking. The traitorous Press has been glorifying the violence of Black Lives Matter and Antifa since prior to the President’s election. They have been hammering home the demonstrably false narrative that Trump is guilty of treason by adhering to foreign foes, which would necessarily subject him to the death penalty. They parade sham psychiatrists around, depicting the President as a “Mad King,” whose assassin would be smiled upon by history. They dedicate inordinate amounts of page space and airtime to mass murderers, gleefully dancing on the yet to be dug graves of the still warm bodies of the victims, celebrating their propaganda victory, and providing incentive to future killers in search of precisely this kind of notoriety.

They took a decidedly different tone when Kathy Griffin posed for a picture which appeared to show her holding the President’s decapitated head. Take for example Aja Romano at Vox, who wrote at the time;

Right-wing media and opinion writers rushed to criticize the incident as an example of the left’s vicious hostility toward the president and his administration, calling it “the tip of the liberal violence iceberg” and “political pornography.” But the context behind Griffin’s photo further complicates the controversy it has attracted.

The violent nature of the Griffin photo is also in keeping with its creator’s artistic tradition. Shields’s photographic art often flirts with violent themes, even when it’s not actively targeting political figures. For instance, in 2011 he collected blood from celebrities for use in his art, and later drenched his studio, Lindsay Lohan, and other performers in it.

While it’s arguable that none of these artistic statements were as shocking as the picture of Griffin holding Trump’s decapitated head drenched in fake blood, it’s also important to understand that Griffin and Shields’s photo recalls another artistic tradition: images of women beheading men.

The artists Lavinia Fontana and Artemisia Gentileschi painted recurring images of the biblical story of Judith beheading Holofernes. For Gentileschi in particular, the story allowed her to assert her empowerment through the metaphorical beheading of men with positions of political and sexual power over her. Modern artists like photographer Cindy Sherman have also turned to this theme.

Ah, well, as long as it’s being done all the time in the name of feminism, I suppose this is a great idea.

Then there was that play where Trump was depicted as Julius Caesar, and assassinated, night after night, in front of a live studio audience, for months.  Also at Vox, Alissa Wilkinson tells us “Why outrage over Shakespeare in the Park’s Trump-like Julius Caesar is so misplaced” by writing;

But right-wing media outlets’ swift move to offense and outrage over the production — and the uproar that ensued — does call into question how well any of those who are upset grasp the history of Shakespeare and his place in the Western canon, and whether they’re at familiar with Julius Caesar itself.

Because in short, a lot of people have completely missed the point of both the production and the play.

Interestingly, none of the media outlets currently fretting over the Trump parody video are terribly concerned with the context of The Kingsman, from which the scene was composed.

The Trump assassination play was sponsored by the New York Times, and CNN, both of which have been relentlessly hostile, and often dishonest, critics of the President.

Speaking of the New York Times, they famously published a story imagining the President’s assassination by a Russian spy who, upon failure of his weapon to fire, is assisted by none other than a Secret Service agent, just as anxious to see his boss take the dirt nap;

The Russian waited until they were a few steps past before he drew the gun. He sighted on the center of the president’s back, and squeezed the trigger.

The Makarov misfired.

The Secret Service agent at the president’s shoulder heard the click, spun into a crouch. He registered the scene instantly, drawing his own weapon with razor-edge reflexes.

The Russian tasted failure. He closed his eyes and waited to pay the cost.

It did not come.

He opened his eyes. The Secret Service agent stood before him, presenting his Glock, butt first.

“Here,” the agent said politely. “Use mine. …”

How about Joe Biden, who announced his campaign for President of the United States, by releasing a video of the violence from Charlottesville, featuring none other than your humble correspondent, and calling the communists who planned and initiated that mayhem, “a courageous group of Americans”.

Then there is the media’s praise and promotion of Mark Bray, the Jewish professor who authored “Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook” which glorified Left wing political violence across the last century, spanning several continents, in enthusiastic support of precisely the mayhem we’ve seen plague our discourse for the last several years.

No wonder the media is so concerned about images depicting their deaths. They know all too well what their intent is, when they promote violence across their mediums. They want Republicans to be assaulted and afraid to show their faces. They want the President to be assassinated, and incapable of leading the country. So they promote exactly that sort of thing across their pages, airwaves, and websites, and they’ve gotten everything but the President’s funeral as a return on their investment.

For the Right to respond in kind, terrifies them, precisely because they know how effective this sort of thing can be. They encouraged violence, they got it, and so they promoted more violence, and watched in glee as the violence escalated unchecked. They do not want to live in a world, where they are actually under the kind of threats they constantly pretend they are under. They fear if these sorts of things continue to proliferate, that the next mass shooter might kill somebody who actually deserves it, and they know full well that they would rank very high on that sort of hit list.

But, thanks in large part to their successful efforts to deplatform their critics, they are shielded from the sort of input that might cause them to consider why people would cheer at a video depicting their violent demise. All they know is that they hate the President, and that anyone who doesn’t agree with them is a Nazi, because that is what they see in their Twitter mentions, and talk about with one another over cocktails.

 

 

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E077 – Listen

I am usually the first to say that people who act in wicked ways ought not be rewarded with political success.

This is an important lesson our country has yet to learn about the Antifa and Black Lives Matter criminality, which has plagued our streets for several years. The repercussions of this failure will be with us for decades to come, even if we were to correct course right this minute. When violence and deception are rewarded with something so valuable as political power, one cannot be surprised if violence and deception become regular features of our existence.

Unfortunately, it is precisely that failure which has resulted in another sort of violence, far less favored by the media. White racial terrorism used to be a Left wing myth, evidence of which had to be fabricated in the form of fake hate crimes. Today it has become an all too real subject of our political discourse, brought to the forefront of our National conversation by a curious alignment of priorities, between the perpetrators of this violence, and its purported targets.

Stephan Balliet spent substantial time and effort on manufacturing improvised firearms and explosive devices, before carrying out his attempted attack on a synagogue in Halle, Germany. He left behind a manifesto of sorts, detailing more his methods than his motives, but is reported to have confessed his intent to police, and also streamed video of the assault, in which he blamed Jews for all too real problems facing his country, and ours.

He is not the first to do this, obviously. Before him came Patrick Crusius, Brenton Tarrant, Robert Bowers, and Dylann Roof, to name just a few. This list is likely to grow longer, perhaps long enough for us to begin forgetting the names, because of our society’s stubborn refusal to grapple with the root causes of these crimes, and worse, a morbid drive to double down on precisely the misguided and malicious patterns which preceded, and, arguably, necessitated them.

Normally when people resort to political violence, we rightly critique the methods of the criminal. Whatever one’s cause, no matter how righteous, violence, we insist, is never the answer. We live in democratic societies, where avenues are purportedly provided for political and social change, which do not necessitate bloodshed, thereby depriving such acts of justification. We purport to embrace free speech, respect the rights of individuals, and protect minorities from persecution at the hands of the Mob.

Had we continued to honor these time tested traditions, it would be difficult indeed to find a soul on this Earth who would watch the gruesome videos of these attacks, and find them inspiring. Their so-called “manifestos” would be dismissed by all, just as they are currently dismissed today by the majority, as the senseless rantings of deranged criminals. We would find them no more worthy of consideration, than we would the lyrics of gangster rap, or “death metal”.

Sadly, we have not honored these traditions. Some ideas, even some rather substantial facts, have been deemed too dangerous to be discussed openly, by our ruling classes. Their frantic and futile efforts to hide the truth, and suppress dissent, have resulted in precisely the outcome they purport to be trying to prevent. With each such outcome, these censorious efforts are increased, and coupled with ever louder calls to disarm the broader law abiding populace.

The inability to peacefully address legitimate grievances, combined with the drive for disarmament, create a wholly justified sense of dread, and urgency, amongst the growing numbers of people who understand these truths our rulers try so hard to suppress. Seeing in their futures a world where degeneracy, brutality, and chaos, prevail over the forces of decency, law, and order, otherwise good men reach the conclusion that cowardice alone prevents men from taking up arms against these threats to civilization.

People who reach these conclusions are further troubled by the observation that no leader has emerged to guide them toward victory. Anyone who emerges with the potential for that leadership, is rapidly set upon by the powers that be. They are assaulted, silenced, and sucked into costly legal battles which incapacitate them for years at a time.

Simultaneously, they see innocent men imprisoned, bankrupted, slandered, and worse. With time and repetition, the message becomes clear. Innocence is no defense against this threat, and thus remaining innocent has no benefit.

In a rapidly growing number of minds, these circumstances, taken together, spell out a clear choice. Either fight now, and hope that others follow suit, or cower slavishly, secure in the knowledge that far worse evils will result.

To attack the motives of such men, only proves their point. To try and silence these views, only confirms the suspicion. To disarm the populace, only increases the urgency.

The predictable result, is more of the same.

Since the intellectual capacity of those who created these problems is not a subject of debate, we can only conclude that this is precisely the desired outcome.

Our rulers, and their propagandists, do not mourn the loss of innocent life. Given their fondness for war and infanticide, that much should seem obvious. Every body, bullet, fire, and funeral, serves only as a pretext for their continued abuses. Every warrior who jumps the gun, and sacrifices himself in this “leaderless resistance” is one less warrior to support the inevitable emergence of a competent leader. Their stubborn insistence on grouping advocates of terrorism with advocates of policy, slanders the latter to the benefit of the former, because they know all too well that policy would rightly doom their ambitions.

They are quite literally “asking for it”, and for that reason, we would be fools to celebrate the granting of their wishes.

 

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E076 – Best of the Radical Agenda Volume 5

Here at the Radical Agenda, there are few things we take greater pride in than our work ethic. Among the things on that very short list, are our extensive body of prior excellent work, and our ambitions to produce even more amazing content in the future.

It is with those priorities in mind that we’ll be sacrificing the present for today, and leaving you with this Best Of compilation, in place of today’s live airing of the show.

Especially if you are a new listener, this will be a very special treat for you. Today’s Best Of Compilation is made up entirely of material produced prior to August of 2017. As long time listeners are well aware, the historic events of that month marked a dramatic shift in the tone of the content.

A lot of people say the show used to be better back then. That is by no means a unanimous consensus, as I’m certainly better informed than I was back then, but it is undeniable that the show was edgier and more high energy before I had to put everything through the mental filter of “What will the lawyers say?”.

I am confident you’ll enjoy these blasts from the past either way, and you may rest assured that I am hard at work addressing things which will improve our prospects for the future.

 

 

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

 

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E075 – The Ukraine Connection

What you are about to read is literally a conspiracy theory. When I say literally, I mean it in the literal sense that I am theorizing about a conspiracy, not as a means by which to discredit the ideas here discussed. I am looking at a great deal of information, seeing a pattern developing, and connecting dots which may or may not actually be appropriate to connect. I am doing this because I think this fits a more credible story, than the myriad stories we are expected to believe.

This will make a great deal more sense if you are familiar with the important work Hunter Wallace has done at Occidental Dissent. Spelling out every detail here is beyond the scope of the project you now have your eyes on, but whatever details I leave out are only for the sake of making this more concise, and not for the purposes of rescuing a preordained narrative.

On the most recent episode of the Radical Agenda, Hunter was my guest, and the show ended up going more than an hour over the usual time. This was because there was just so much to discuss, and the first 70 minutes ended up being dedicated to a less scandalous political discussion. Hunter’s first guest appearance on the show also plays into this a great deal.

During those episodes we discussed subversive efforts within what could commonly be understood as the Alt Right movement. Specifically, Weev, the Jewish “CTO” of the supposedly most trafficked neo-Nazi website on Earth, the Daily Stormer. Later, we would come to discuss the site’s purported main author, Andrew Anglin.

There were two things which we did not have the opportunity to discuss in detail, which Hunter was at the time unfamiliar with at the time of each airing. These were the details of the Mueller investigation into (((Russian))) meddling in the 2016 election, and the Sines v. Kessler civil litigation, pertaining to the Unite the Right rally of August 2017.

More recently, Ukraine has been in the news as the latest Democrat excuse for the impeachment of Donald Trump. Ukraine is also home to Weev of the Daily Stormer.

Jared Howe will be joining me to discuss.

My conspiracy theory is that these things are not nearly so disconnected as most would believe. When one understands the details of all these things, and also understands what Hitler actually meant when he talked about the “Big Lie”, these seemingly disparate phenomenon make a great deal more sense as part of a conspiracy, than they do as a bunch of unforeseeable accidents.

This is not to say everything went according to plan, mind you. If that were the case, I would not be able to tell this story.

The General Conception of Leftist Deceit

Since the Democrats are telling us that Russian intelligence hacked our Democracy to help Donald Trump, we can rule that out. If that was true, the Democrats would be telling us something else.

If that is not obvious to you already, I’ll briefly illustrate, but if you don’t take to it right away then the rest of this is going to sound completely ridiculous. You may continue reading for the sheer amusement of the exercise, or you can stop right here. To one who does not understand this, the world is a chaotic mess where everyone who matters is completely insane, and it is a miracle any of us are still alive. Anyone who tries to imagine the world as more orderly than this, is necessarily a conspiracy theorist to some extent, and the only question is the soundness of one’s theories.

“All this was inspired by the principle – which is quite true in itself – that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation.” ~ Adolf Hitler

The Jew (or if one prefers, the Leftist, his goyim dupe) always accuses his opponent of that which he himself is doing, which is, at the same time, the thing he fears most from his opponent. The goal of this trick is twofold. One, to divert suspicion from his own behavior, by virtue signaling about how terrible he purports to think such behaviors are, so that nobody would imagine him doing this thing he has so loudly renounced. Secondly, he keeps the target of his enmity so defensive about the accusation, that the opponent goes to extraordinary lengths to avoid even the appearance of the thing of which he is falsely accused, which at the same time, is precisely that thing which would secure the Jew’s defeat.

The easiest example of this race baiting. Democrats stoke racial tensions constantly, while calling Republicans racists. No matter what a Republican does, no matter who a Republican is, he is a racist when he has to face off against a Democrat opponent. This is how you end up with Jewish Nazis like Ben Shapiro, and black White Supremacists like Ben Carson. Likewise, when Justin Trudeau or Ralph Northam get caught in blackface, the story fades from view in short order.

It does not take a conspiracy theorist, or even a rabid Right winger, to see that the Alt Right’s “DR3” meme (Democrats aRe the Real Racists) is funny due to its coupling of multiple things worth mocking. The first of which is that Democrats genuinely are the hard core race realists, while the Republicans they accuse of racism are struggling in futility, trying to live up to the colorblind egalitarian ideals which Leftists pretend to embrace.

Leftists know as well as any Nazi that immigrants are going to vote Left. They know this is largely due to their IQ deficiencies, which they know are genetic in origin. They literally believe that these third worlders are sub human idiots, and they want them in this country, because they want to take advantage of them. It makes old fashioned slavery look tame by comparison. Anyone who opposes this agenda, is accused of wanting to reinstate that comparatively modest institution.

Republicans are largely capable of understanding that part, and thus the catch phrase “Democrats aRe the Real Racists”. They are no less defeated in the conflict however, because they miss the other part of the equation. White Identity would put a stop to this very fast, but because the Republicans have for so long been conditioned to conceive of racial consciousness as a wicked and disreputable political tool, they refuse to embrace it. Thus our politics become a race war in which one side is doing all of the fighting, and the other side, is just complaining about the unfair rules of engagement.

There are a handful of other things you see Democrats go insane about.

“Conspiracy Theories” are certainly high on this list. As long as you destroy the reputation of anyone who thinks two or more people might join together for an illicit plot, nobody with a reputation can ever discover said plot. Democrats are of course immune from the accusation of conspiracy theorizing, when they literally say a foreign government hacked our election to impose a fascist dictatorship upon the Nation.

That would bring us to the other Big Lie. Foreign Interference. More than half of Trump’s first term was handcuffed by the Mueller probe over the completely unfounded allegation that the Russian government interfered in our election. As we’ll soon address, Mueller was nearly arrested for saying this, because it was just plain untrue. Meanwhile, the notorious “Steele Dossier”, which was the basis of the FISA warrant for Carter Page, was literally something to Clinton campaign bought from Russian officials, albeit funneled through a law firm and opposition research agency called Fusion GPS.

You can apply the same standard to these things, as we just did with racism. If the Democrats are accusing Republicans of it, that is because the Democrats are knee deep in precisely that behavior, and they are terrified not only of being caught, but of being beaten at their own game.

(((Russia))), or whoever

With this understood, it becomes obvious that the Democrat Party is telling us this nonsense that Russia covertly facilitated the election of Donald Trump, because they want to cover up something else. From the sheer absurdity of the things they are saying, and the vast numbers of prominent people willing to repeat the same obvious lie, in the face of massive piles of contradictory evidence, it has to be something really, really bad.

The followers of the movement, and indeed the whole nation, must be reminded again and again of the fact that, through the medium of his newspapers, the Jew is always spreading falsehood and that if he tells the truth on some occasions it is only for the purpose of masking some greater deceit, which turns the apparent truth into a deliberate falsehood. The Jew is the Great Master of Lies. Falsehood and duplicity are the weapons with which he fights. ~ Adolf Hitler

Liars do what they can to present as many verifiable or at least plausible facts as possible, so as to bolster the credibility of their lies, as well as to reduce the cognitive burden involved in keeping track of their deceptions. In keeping with this, the most likely thing the Democrats are trying to cover up, is the actual involvement of a different foreign intelligence agency. It might also stand to reason, that this foreign intelligence agency is of the Eastern European variety. Ukraine, perhaps.

If you’re a Democrat, Russian intelligence makes for an attractive patsy in this pursuit. You hate Russia because it is no longer communist. Republicans, still enamored with the fabled legacy of Ronald Reagan, and not at all well versed in Cyrillic, are more than willing to believe that the Russkis are up to their old Red tricks again. They are well trained to think fascism and communism are the same thing, which is why they are genuinely confused as to why Democrat used to love the Soviet Union, but view Vladimir Putin as the incarnation of evil. The absolute diabolical infamy of Soviet espionage tactics, makes literally anything plausible, and this combined with high tech talk which goes right over the heads of aging boomers, creates an information environment where one is less than shocked to find that things do not add up.

In short, a proper swamp in which the Jew may thrive.

The nature of the Internet being what it is, trying to track down the origin of a nefarious character on the Internet is all but pointless. If the actor has enough talent to be considered an intelligence liability, he has enough talent to make sure you have no concept of his geography. If any of this activity looked like it came from Russia, that is because the people who did it, wanted it to look that way.

What evidence have we seen that Russia hacked the DNC? Well, none, actually. Not even an investigation by the United States government. Just the word of the DNC’s own privately hired IT contractors.

The name of that company might ring familiar to you if you have been watching the news about the most recent excuse to try and impeach Trump. “CrowdStrike” as they are called, is a firm which was financed to the tune of $100 million by Google Capital. Google Capital, which now goes by the name of CapitalG, is an arm of Alphabet Inc., Google’s parent company. Eric Schmidt, the chairman of Alphabet, has been a staunch and active supporter of Hillary Clinton and is a longtime donor to the Democratic Party. If you trust them, well, you’re probably one of those people who is reading for the amusement alone at this point anyway.

The current Trump/Ukraine saga involves President Trump asking the Ukrainian President to “look into” Crowdstrike, as well as Joe Biden’s bragging that he withheld $1 Billion in US loan guarantees to Ukraine, until then President Poroshenko fired a prosecutor who was investigating Burisma Holdings, the Ukrainian company that gave Biden’s son Hunter a seat on its board, paying him up to $85,000 a month for, essentially, a no show job which he had no experience to justify.

Biden is tripping all over himself about the scandal, hoping the media will bail him out. The CIA is threatening the President of the United States. Things are getting very ugly over this, and powerful people are very invested in keeping something secret.

Ukraine is the 8th Whitest country in the world, according to data from the CIA fact book, and the 58th most corrupt according to Transparency International’s 2018 Corruption Perception Index. Which by this data, makes it the 2nd most corrupt White Country on Earth, second only to Russia.

 

 

 

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Outlaw Conservative S01E037 – Coffee with a Cop

If your morning routine is anything like mine, you were listening to Fox & Friends talk about “Coffee with a Cop Day” much of the morning.

It got me thinking…

As regular readers are well aware, I’ve had some adverse experiences with law enforcement over the course of my life. Some of those were due to my own unwise actions, some were solidly in what might be described as grey area, and some were outright crimes committed against me.

You might describe ways of dealing with such events, as a spectrum.

On one end of the spectrum is full on hostility toward the entirety of the institution.

There are plenty of reasons to do this, not the least of which is, it’s popular today. The Democrat Party and the media will be quite happy if you treat cops like garbage, and say terrible things about them. Making those people happy is a good way to avoid slander, assault, lawsuits, and false criminal allegations being made against you. You’re terribly unlikely to be called a “rat”. You won’t be banned from social media for doing it. Even the cops themselves won’t bother you. In fact, being hostile toward police might even keep help to the cops at bay for people who are involved in unlawful activity, because the police might become concerned about the allegation of “harassing an accountability activist”.

Indeed, cop hatred, no matter how vitriolic, is one of few areas in which “Freedom of Speech” is still respected in the United States.

I engaged in that strategy for a long time. I might even go so far as to say that I was one of the best at the art.

Then, one day, I was walking home from a friend’s house late at night. I heard some men angrily yelling, and some women crying. I went to inquire as to the distress of the damsels, and to make a long story short, the men and the women both attempted to attack me.

I retreated until I could retreat no more, drew my revolver, and demanded they back off.

They were drunk, and one of the males said “You’re not gonna shoot me bro, you’re not a cop” and he advanced on me with the gun pointed dead at his chest.

I had gone through this scenario a thousand times, in my own head, at the range, and even, I am sort of embarrassed to admit, in the mirror. I told myself that I was ready to kill if I had to. Part of me even thought it might make me feel powerful.

I was definitely ready to end this guy’s life, and I made the decision right then that I would pull that trigger before my assailants came within arm’s reach of my gun, because I could not risk one of these nutcases gaining control of the weapon.

But I did not feel powerful at all. I felt terrified.

So many things went through my mind so fast. I wish I could think that quickly in everyday life. I remembered every inflammatory thing I had ever said. I imagined what the cops I had been bashing online would say, when they found me with a smoking gun in in my hand, mere feet from a corpse, on Main Street.

I knew the laws of my home state of New Hampshire. We are a “stand your ground” state. I knew I had the beginning of the altercation on video. I knew local businesses probably had security cameras which would back my version of events. I knew I had retreated, even though I didn’t legally have to. I knew I was outnumbered. In short, I knew that I could legally pull that trigger right then and there before he took another step, and I would be cleared of wrongdoing.

I also knew that I had been a drunken fool too many times in my own life, to punch this idiot’s ticket, and feel good about it.

I realized I had precious few seconds to make that life changing decision, as my assailant was less than 20 feet from me. This maniac kept walking toward me like I was pointing a squirt gun at him, and I remember thinking to myself that I was more pissed off about this guy making me kill him, than I was about the assault he intended to inflict.

I drew the line in my head “he puts his toe past that spot, and I’m gonna have some explaining to do”.

Then the police showed up.

No matter how right you are, seeing those police lights while you’re pointing a gun at a guy is terrifying. I went through a very unique combination of lethal terror, and blissful relief.

I thought, “Either these guys are about to shoot me, or they’re about to save my ass, and the suspense is killing me.”

If you’re reading this, it means they saved my ass.

Not only that, but they were incredibly cool about it. They knew I was scared, and they made a point to put me at ease. They looked at video of the incident, took the most aggressive assailant to the drunk tank, and gave me back my revolver.

Like you, I lack a tail, but if I had one, it would have been between my legs as I walked the rest of the way home. I felt dumb about the stuff I had said about cops.

To say my perspective began to change after that night, would be the understatement of the century.

I’ve sort of inched along that spectrum ever since.

Recent experiences have been substantial stumbling blocks along that path. I’ve seen some good people end up on the wrong side of the so called justice system as of late. I have come to know what a truly corrupt government looks like, and discovered just how terrifyingly similar it looks to one with integrity, in the eyes of the casual observer.

In the words of an American statesman named John Hay, “The evils of tyranny are rarely seen but by him who resists it.”

Truer words…

I didn’t feel like I had much of a choice as to what lessons I would learn about the night I had to pull my gun. It seemed clear as day to me that my cop hatred was immature and misguided. If I was going to continue my career as a commentator on the pressing issues of our time, I would have to reform my views, and bring my commentary into alignment with this newly acquired wisdom.

Recent experiences left me with more difficult decisions to make.

I’ve been out of jail for less than two years. Good men who I shared a cell block with won’t be home for a long time. The Department of Homeland Security came dangerously close to calling my very conception of the truth, a terrorist threat.

Keeping the cops at a safe distance, could easily be deemed a prudent decision.

On the other hand, people who want to do things that matter do not always have that option. If you want to be one of the good guys, you have to know the bad guys will lie about you, and they won’t be nearly so shy about talking to cops. If you are a threat to the status quo, then the chances of somebody trying to hurt you are substantial, and if you’re going to be left standing there with a smoking gun in your hand, feet from a corpse on Main Street, it might be wise to get acquainted with the guys who are going to clean up the mess.

So, after a great deal of careful deliberation, I came to the following conclusion. Time will be the judge, as to its wisdom.

Law enforcement is an institution of power. In an age such as the one we find ourselves in, all such institutions are high value targets for the enemies of order and decency. If good people abandon those institutions, they will be controlled by the wicked.

If we let that happen in our towns and cities, a glimpse of what that future looks like, can be found in Charlottesville. The police of that city were abused and treated like garbage. When they did their jobs they were called racists, and made to fear for their own futures. Something tells me there are a few people in this audience who can relate to that feeling.

Kessler had other demonstrations in that city before our arrival in August. The cops did their jobs, and arrested the Leftists who broke the law. The lawyers and judges set those criminals free, and the politicians hassled the cops over what should have been laughable accusations of brutality and civil rights violations. Unfortunately for the cops, and ultimately, for us, the regular people of that city did not have the cops’ backs. So, for them, it was anything but laughable.

By the time we showed up, they had already been beaten into submission. “Risk defaulting on my mortgage for some Nazi jerk who’s gonna call me a pig and walk away from this mess? Forget that!”

Can anyone honestly say they blame them for feeling that way?

With that in mind, the events which unfolded that weekend hardly seem so bizarre. Heroes were imprisoned, criminals celebrated. The cops, notably, were no better off, and last I checked there was a “mass exodus” of officers from that city’s police department. Surely all who abandoned those posts were men with some conscience remaining, and I shutter to think who will replace them.

It has been said that the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is that good men do nothing. That is what happened in Charlottesville, and that is what will happen in your city too, if every adverse experience of yours causes you to abandon the institutions of power. Power abhors a vacuum, and you should too.

For those reasons, and others, it is with the requisite disclaimer of caution that I give my full and enthusiastic endorsement to Coffee with a Cop Day. Most of you will read or listen to this after that spot on the calendar has passed, but unless evil has completely overtaken your jurisdiction, it’s not too late to make a powerful friend.

Yet.

There are people who will say this is dangerous, and you would have to be a fool to argue with them. I found out the hard way that even obedience to the law won’t keep you out of a jail, much less a courtroom. As things get worse, normalcy itself is all but outlawed, and that can make it difficult for normal folks to remain in alignment with the opinions of the legislature. But I once had an adversary who said “We cannot choose to be safe, only powerful” and while I hesitate to give this foe any credit, dude had a point. We have no safe path, and thus our choice is not whether or not we engage with law enforcement, but how we do so.

We can make enemies of power, and hope against all odds that each of us individually escapes their mortal glance, or we can undertake the dangerous work of spreading the truth, to the people whose opinions matter most.

Join us, this and every Wednesday from 5-7pm US Eastern time for another exciting episode of the Outlaw Conservative Podcast, where I look forward to hearing from you at 808-4-OUTLAW, or on our Discord Server at https://OutlawConservative.com/discord.

On another note, have you tried the Brave Browser?

Follow Chris on TelegramParlerMinds – Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E074 – Occidental Dissent

There was this thing a few years back some of you may have heard of, called the Alt Right. It fizzled out pretty quickly, but they had some good memes and whatnot.

Before the Alt Right went the way of bell-bottoms, I had the privilege of getting acquainted with a guy who goes by the name of Hunter Wallace. As things descended into chaos, his blog, OccidentalDissent.com, stood out from the rest. If for no other reason, the simple fact that he had not completely lost his bloody mind, which, at the time, seemed like a pretty high bar to set.

Today, Hunter is about the only, for lack of a better word, alternative site, I keep up with. I saw everybody else spiraling out into ideological rabbit holes, and determined for myself that my long term interests were best served by staying tethered to the only plane of existence most people know. Hunter has served as a fine conduit to keep up with the nether realms, as he seems to have shown a unique capacity for looking into the abyss, without the darkness overtaking him.

Amongst his greatest accomplishments are obtaining for himself a beautiful wife, who was kind enough to give him a son. He describes himself as “utterly normal” and for this reason, will likely come to have a museum exhibit dedicated to him at some point in the not so distant future. Until then, we are fortunate to have him as our honored guest, on this afternoon’s live airing of the Radical Agenda.

If you have heard Hunter’s prior appearances, then you already know this will be a very special treat. Do not let this focus on his sanity and stability fool you into thinking this will be in any way dull. Nor should one assume from this high praise that Hunter and I will be nodding in agreement the whole time. Aside from his awe inspiring capacity to stay sane in a world gone mad, the other thing I very much like about Hunter is his capacity to make me interrogate myself, when I find that I am at odds with his substantial wisdom, which is not at all infrequent.

At the time of this writing, I do not have a precise agenda set for our talk today, but that is not for lack of things to talk about. It would be more accurate to say that I have so many things I want to run by him, that any attempt to write a cohesive show description would surely be counterproductive.

So, don’t miss this one.

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Radical Agenda S05E073 – Siege Posting

Last Friday, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Kevin McAleenan announced his department’s “Strategic Framework for Combating Terrorism and Targeted Violence“. From the title, this would seem an appropriate venture for an arm of the Federal Government, tasked with securing the homeland. Stopping terrorism and other forms of criminal violence are amongst the primary functions of any government, and thus publishing a strategic framework for combating these things ought raise not an eyebrow.

This framework however, did raise a few eyebrows. More than a few.

It was curiously celebrated by the Left wing media, which is profoundly odd, considering their contempt for securing the Nation more generally. They opposed restricting the entry of migrants from countries known for sponsoring terrorism, even migrants from countries the United States is presently at war with. They oppose securing our borders, and enforcing our immigration laws. They support the disenfranchisement and wholesale replacement of the people of this country. They have openly praised violent communist agitators who attack permitted demonstrations, while seemingly failing to notice even more reprehensible Left wing terrorism. They supported the FBI’s attempted overthrow of our duly elected President. They seek to disarm and silence our citizenry, abolish our constitution, and institute in its place a wholly anti-American global order, which subordinates us to other Nations & Peoples.

Just as curiously, some of the most patriotic people in the country were terrified of the news. They feared they might be targeted by their own government. This fear was granted substantial weight by an abundance of evidence of this happening, provided well before the official announcement. Headline after headline has emerged of supposed “White Supremacists” being arrested on charges ranging from a malicious disregard for their claims of self defense, to drugs and weapons, to stretched interpretations of “threats” supposedly uttered on the Internet.

Of particular note were the framework’s focus on “White Supremacy” and seeming lack of concern for violent communist groups like Antifa.

While violence carried out at the hands of White men who rightly feel threatened by our Nation’s current trajectory have certainly been subjected to the most fantastic media coverage, and while those attacks may, depending on our unit of measure, have racked up higher body counts than certain other motives, they are hardly the most frequent of crimes, nor the most pressing threat to the general stability and order of the country. So rare are these problems, that everyone remembers the names of the offenders. McVeigh, Roof, Bowers, Tarrant, Crusius.

Can you name all 19 of the 9/11 hijackers?

On the other side of the ledger, Leftists have, to name just a few;

All in the name of love & tolerance, of course.

How many of the perpetrators of these crimes can you name or pick out of a lineup? Their masks and black bloc tactics understandably increase the challenge, but it is noteworthy that even those who have been killed or apprehended in the course of their violent crimes, are not held up to the media fearmongering of their Right wing counterparts.

It is also vital to here note, that it is for the sake of time alone, that we cut this list short. The crimes, threats, and disruptions of the political and ideological Left are simply too numerous to count. Perhaps, in addition to the Leftist media’s unabashed sympathy for these criminals, it is the near constant occurrence of these crimes that prevents them from making the news more frequently. Like black on black crime in Chicago, St. Louis, and Baltimore, it almost seems unnewsworthy to dedicate headlines and airtime, to that which occurs so frequently. The government, on the other hand, should certainly dedicate resources to reducing said frequency, but they don’t.

With this in mind, it becomes quite the curiosity to see language like the following peppered throughout the DHS framework in question;

  • This Strategic Framework clearly elucidates the nature of today’s domestic challenges, including providing an
    extended assessment of the dangers posed by domestic terrorists, including racially-and ethnically-motivated
    violent extremists, particularly white supremacist violent extremists.
  • White supremacist violent extremism, one type of racially- and ethnically-motivated violent extremism, is one
    of the most potent forces driving domestic terrorism.
  • For some violent extremist movements—including radical Islamist terrorists and racially- and ethnically-motivated violent extremists, particularly white supremacist violent extremists—the online space appears essential to their recent growth.

Given what we know about the prevalence and open advocacy of Left wing violence, in contrast with the scarcity of such acts on the Right, and the fact that there are no reputable advocates of White racial interests in the United States who advocate for terrorism or other forms of criminal mayhem, it is curious indeed to see “White Supremacy” so specifically singled out in a framework for countering terrorism and targeted violence.

Were “White Supremacist” terrorists among a mere list of more prominent terrorist threats, perhaps the law abiding White Nationalist could limit his fears of reprisal to the aforementioned Leftist criminals. Perhaps he could feel confident in seeking the protection he is owed from his government, by right of his citizenship, against these all too real threats to his life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. Under those circumstances, we could comfortably work with the Department of Homeland Security, to weed out from our ranks those who would sabotage our efforts by engaging in the sort of criminal behavior this framework allegedly seeks to combat, and which all reasonable people agree is harmful to our goals as well.

Sadly, the peculiar specificity of the referenced framework has led some to understandably question, if the United States Government is gearing up for a crackdown on its own citizenry, for entirely ideological, political, and racial purposes.

Still others, question not. Perhaps lacking curiosity, perhaps lacking the intellectual capacity for such an inquiry, perhaps engaged in subversive efforts, or perhaps determined to engage in criminal violence themselves, some have rushed to conclude that all is lost. They shout for all foolish enough to listen, that doom is upon us, and that the highest service to one’s country, indeed the path to Sainthood, is precisely the sort of violent criminal activity the Department of Homeland Security is purporting to target. A self fulfilling prophecy, if there ever was one.

Unsurprisingly, these self professed revolutionaries hold anonymity as their highest value. Well, maybe the second highest.

The highest value is destroying the reputations of literally every White Nationalist who you could pick out of a lineup, while elevating their own profiles. They are fortunate to have the assistance of Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube in this pursuit, curiously retaining access to these platforms while the people they defame and attack are relegated to darker, and more expensive, corners of the Internet.

Their own anonymity is still a high priority, though not so much that they have relinquished the benefits of mainstream financial tools. Notably, as I check the website of one of the more flamboyant examples of this foolishness, I find no meaningful references to Bitcoin, and zero references to more privacy centric cryptocurrencies like Monero. Technologies the targets of their enmity have had to familiarize themselves with, in order not to starve.

Lest the reader think this is because these revolutionaries are so devoted to the cause that they care not for financial gain, these outspoken anti-capitalist racial warriors are more than happy to sell you a t-shirt through one of their corporate partners, and if you act now, they happen to have a 20% discount code in effect for the next hour or so.

If you have any trouble at checkout, you can contact them using their GMail account. The savvy observer might notice that their website lacks so much as a self signed SSL certificate to protect the privacy of their audiences, but again, all financial dealings are handled through their corporate partner, so fear not when you enter your name, address, and credit card number at checkout.

Since somebody with an address and social security number has to be receiving the payments from this corporate partner, it would seem the goal here is not so much the sort of complete anonymity which would shield them from State persecution, as much as it is hiding their identities from the people stupid enough to take them seriously. While they worship mass shooters and encourage their audiences to follow along similiar paths, they are clearly not in the slightest bit worried that the State will do anything to them.

You, are another story, but they are clearly not worried about your well being, either. If they were, they wouldn’t be encouraging you to die.

Thank You, Acting Secretary McAleenan

If the Department of Homeland Security does what it says it is going to do – and I recognize that this is a rather substantial “if” – then the interests of nearly all White Nationalists are in line with the interests of the Federal Government, as outlined in the strategic framework. We have a very serious problem in the White Nationalist movement, and we require the government’s assistance in solving it.

That problem, is anonymous fedposters.

Most of them are just weak minded, if well intentioned people, who have been taken advantage of. They are being taken advantage of by hostile outside forces, which have figured out that our culture of secrecy and anonymity is a weakness which they can exploit.

We are not terrorists. The people who try to make us out to be terrorists, are invariably hostile to our interests.

That goes ESPECIALLY for the ones, who from behind a thin veil of anonymity, pretend to be us.

The doxing, assaults, threats, harassment, defamations, false accusations, lawfare, and other maladies visited upon us by the Reds, have necessitated a culture of secrecy and anonymity in the White Nationalist movement. This has been turned against us by the same criminals who necessitated it, by fraudulently portraying themselves as part of our movement. With the assistance of Big Tech, they have, in under two years, obtained undeserved status through the reach these enemy corporations have afforded to them, and they have used that status to undermine the reputations of almost everyone who you could pick out of a lineup.

Perhaps most notably, they aim their enmity at the President of the United States, whom, like the Democrat Party, they would very much like to see lose next year’s election.

This should come as no surprise, since our enemies discussed almost precisely this strategy openly in the Journal Nature.

Policy 3 leverages the finding that clusters self-organize from an initially disordered group of users; it recommends that platform administrators promote the organization of clusters of anti-hate users, which could serve as a ‘human immune system’ to fight and counteract hate clusters. Policy 4 exploits the fact that many hate groups online have opposing views. The policy suggests that the platform administrators introduce an artificial group of users to encourage interactions between hate clusters that have opposing views, with a view to the hate clusters subsequently battling out their differences among themselves. The authors’ modelling demonstrated that such battles would effectively remove large hate clusters that have opposing views. Once put into action, policies 3 and 4 would require little direct intervention by the platform administrators; however, setting opposing clusters against each other would require meticulous engineering.

These people are not part of our movement. They are hostile outsiders, here to discredit us, to help the Democrat Party, and they are more than happy to see innocent people die at the hands of well meaning people stupid enough to listen to them. If we cannot unmask and deplatform them, then we must hope the government does, or they will destroy our movement, and our hope of salvation.

This Is Not A New Problem

It occurs to me that I never heard of most of these people before the Unite the Right rally. It thus crossed my mind to suggest, that they only entered our discourse after that event. It turns out, that whether this particular set of subversives is new or old, this tactic has been with us since well prior to Charlottesville.

Peppered throughout the complaint in the Sines v Kessler lawsuit, are references to unnamed and pseudonymous “participants” and “co-conspirators” who said violent and incriminating things, yet curiously seem to have escaped the wrath of the Jews. Their antics are being used to provide a fraudulent context into which our non-incriminating statements are framed as threats and confessions of intent to carry out violent crimes. While the people our Seige LARPing revolutionaries defame and attack are having their lives destroyed by lawfare due to such tactics, these guys are living it up on social media, and raking in the bucks from merch sales and Super Chats. All with no fear of being caught by authorities, through the paper trails their financial dealings necessitate.

James Mason warned of this in Siege. He called it “Linkage”

Here’s another new word to add to your vocabulary: Linkage. It used to be something known primarily to mechanics but, as of earlier this year, it could also be in your future. This one may replace ‘entrapment’ as the latest dirty trick of the System designed to deflate any potential the Movement may have before it can get off the ground. It’s a quasi-legal take-off on “guilt by association” which, even ten years ago, would never have held water except that, now, the source from which the juries and grand juries are drawn is sufficiently conditioned that they’ll indict or convict on cue from the System.

This arose out of the serious scare given to the System by one splinter of the Movement calling itself The Order. The System – so surprised and enraged that there is fight left anywhere – sought to tie in (or “link”) as many other Movement facets as they thought they could in order to, if not wipe them out totally, at least pin them down in a defensive legal jungle wherein they either retain expensive counsel or lose by default. Some top Movement people were literally on the run and others were sweating blood a few months ago because of it.

See some examples below…

 

If you read through all of those, you’ll notice that in the middle of all this anonymous shitposting by people not party to this suit, they shoe horned this in,

Defendant Cantwell expressly “encourage[d]” Radical Agenda followers “to carry a concealed firearm”

Well, that’s an odd way to quote somebody. Why not just quote the whole sentence?

This sorry excuse for a quote, came from a blog post titled “Unite the Right Updates“. I wasn’t talking about the Unite the Right rally in this post, I was talking about the Radical Agenda listeners meetup, which those in the know will recall, did not result in any violence at all. Just a bunch of communists unsuccessfully trying to frame me for a crime, a task they would have better luck with, later in the evening. Moreover, the point of telling people to conceal their weapons was a warning AGAINST open carry, even though it is legal in Virginia.

Many of you have asked about meeting up with me personally. Since the main event is likely to be chaotic, we might have trouble catching up at the main event. I am working on coordinating a meetup for Radical Agenda listeners on Friday, but I have to be careful about how the details are announced. Sadly, anything I say to you here, I also say to the media, communists, and other criminal elements. For this event, I encourage those with the legal authority, to carry a concealed firearm. Open carry will draw more unnecessary attention to us, so if you do not have a license to carry, please secure your firearms elsewhere and let us worry about defense.

Humorous how they saw fit to leave out that “for those with the legal authority” part, and replaced it with the non-quote “Radical Agenda followers”. This would have been a lot more conspicuous, were it not for the pages of anonymous crime posting by people who for all we know are plaintiffs in the suit.

No wonder these guys think doxing is a major problem. They might miss out on their big pay day if they get caught. It would sure be a shame if the Department of Homeland Security found out who gave Roberta Kaplan the fodder she needed for this fraudulent lawsuit.

You Ain’t Siege, Bruh

Replete throughout the inane ramblings of the fools who have wrought this hell on us with their subversive activities, are references to a book called Siege, by James Mason.

I actually read Siege. If these guys did, they aren’t recalling its substance very well.

But you don’t have to go read a lengthy collection of old newsletters to know how James Mason feels about fedposters. He personally responded the the DHS framework on September 21st.

Anything other than this word will not only lead down the path of failure, but derail you from not only the truth but also remove you from the ability to commit FULLY to SURVIVAL and SELF MASTERY.

That podcast is worth a listen.

Survival, that is kind of an important feature in the struggle for one’s Race & Nation. People who tell you suicide missions and life in prison are the highest goals, probably are not thinking like James Mason. He also warns against even giving the impression or appearance of evil in the podcast, which is something our fedposting friends seem to have missed the memo on.

If the feds go and arrest people who con our men into getting themselves killed or captured, then I say thank you to the feds.

However, it is undeniable that Siege spoke of revolutionary violence. Lethal force, in no uncertain terms.

So, has Mason changed his position? Is he cucking and caving to pressure in the heat of the very moment when our glorious revolution is about to bring forth the ethnostate?

Hardly.

To illustrate, I’ll here provide some choice excerpts from the book,

A comrade sent me a pamphlet issued by a bunch of idiots who happen to be the proud owners of some professional printing equipment and who thereby imagine themselves qualified to speak on the subject of revolution. In this pamphlet they darkly talk in grave tones about “conspiratorial activity”. At that point my suspicions of  them which I’d had since the mid-70’s were confirmed: they are children playing with matches!

And sadly, today, one need nothing so unique as a printing press to make similar idiotic noise to that which Mason here references. Every retard with a smartphone can start fedposting, and if you are foolish enough to take such children seriously, then their recreational frolicking with the proverbial match book, will burn down your metaphorical house.

The term conspiracy is not now, and never has been, part of my vocabulary. It is DANGEROUS! I should say UNNECESSARILY DANGEROUS! For conspiracy means TALK and talk is counter-revolutionary. Talk is what the System and its pimps LOVE most of all. In case you didn’t know it already, you can do big. Federal time for merely “conspiring” to do something. You need not take any action, only TALK about it to a circle of three or more (including yourself), and THAT constitutes conspiracy! (And one of the favorites of the System is to charge people with “conspiring to violate civil rights” which sometimes doesn’t even require the discussion of any action.)

Now, speaking as the host of a talk radio show, I must depart from Mr. Mason’s disdain for verbal exchange. On the other hand, I’m not talking about doing anything illegal, and I suspect that is more the point. Or is it?

Take the case of Daniel McMahon, whom federal prosecutors allege is aka Jack Corbin. He was recently indicted and arrested for allegedly making threats against some violent nigger communist in Charlottesville. At a recent bond hearing, McMahon was ordered to remain in custody by U.S. Magistrate Judge Thomas Wilson. “He is cheering on mass shooters. That is what really bothers me,” Wilson said of the 31-year-old Brandon, Florida, man. “This is a red flag.”

Speaking of Pittsburgh synagogue shooter Robert Bowers, Corbin wrote on Gab, that he had “more balls” than most other white nationalists, adding: “God bless that man.” This is a perfectly lawful statement, but it is being used to keep him in custody on other charges. Did Jack come up with that idea on his own? Maybe. Or maybe he, like me and a lot of other people, got his head filled up with stupid ideas by subversives in his Gab mentions and comments.

If you believe at all in the power of propaganda, and I doubt you would be listening to the Radical Agenda if you did not, then you have to realize that enemy propagandists would target us with carefully crafted narratives capable of convincing our people to go astray. They would not tell you to embrace diversity and become a communist, they would tell you to do self destructive things in the name of helping the cause you currently support. I am thoroughly convinced that precisely this sort of campaign has been visited upon us, and we witness its outcome on a near daily basis as one fedposter after another is picked up by federal agents.

Anybody who is loudly and publicly talking about doing violent and illegal things, on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, without so much as a Bitcoin wallet, PGP key, or SSL certificate, is at best, an idiot, with the far more likely scenario outlined next, by Mason.

But of course you figure that you are too careful for that, eh? You think you know and can trust the people you deal with, right? Let me quickly relate the story of how two brothers were framed by the Feds and who are now serving a six-year term for conspiracy. A hired pimp was sent into their group in Columbus , Ohio , in 1977 to first gather information and, later, to act as agent provocateur. He spent two years building his credibility before he began to get a little bold with his suggestions. It doesn’t matter how “tight” your imagined security is if it includes one professional pimp. This agent kept bucking for some kind of “action”, something “solid” as a strike against forced bussing in Columbus . Finally he got around to the idea of bombing a school. Then came the brothers’ big mistake: they did not at that moment say to the pimp, “Get thee behind me!”. They listened, they discussed the pros and cons. And later, in the Federal courtroom after their arrests by an army of FBI agents, they saw and heard themselves on wide-screen motion picture “conspiring” with police agents to bomb a school building! The all-White jury didn’t take even thirty minutes to return a verdict of “Guilty”!

Take your favorite fedposter. Any one of them, or for that matter, any ten. Now imagine they each make $65,000/year on the payroll of some hostile entity, be it the FBI, Israeli Intelligence, or the Open Societies Foundation. If you think paying that salary for 2 or more years is outside the reach, or beneath the dignity, of any of those institutions, then you are an idiot. Could George Soros shell out <$2 Million to convince Nazis to send themselves to prison or worse, and give the media a propaganda victory? You can be certain it would be the best investment he ever made, and that he would gladly accept some dead Jewish senior citizens, as the cost of doing business.

With that in mind, the words of James Mason are again prescient.

In revolution the price of failure generally is death. So whatever you do and whatever course you choose, don’t sell yourself cheap. MAKE IT COUNT!

Moreover, their behavior begins to make a lot more sense when you assume they are professional hostiles.

  • They are happy to take your money, but they never seem to need any, and they take no measures to protect the privacy of those (on the Right) dumb enough to pay them.
  • They don’t want you to know who they are, but they don’t cover their tracks sufficiently to keep authorities from discovering who they are.
  • They themselves have little interest in achieving Sainthood though suicidal violence, they are just Preachers.
  • They are very considered about concealing their own identities from you, but not from the powers that be, and they do nothing to protect your privacy.
  • They attack everyone who needs money, or cares about their own safety, as a grifter and a coward.

If the Department of Homeland Security wants to remove those people from our political discourse, then I am enthusiastically in support of this program.

Of course, the thinking reader must say to himself at some point “But Chris, the possibility that violence will someday be our only recourse, certainly exists. We thus cannot dismiss everyone who speaks of violence as hostile to our interests. How can we tell the difference between fed and righteous revolutionary?”

This is not a simple question, but we can very easily rule some things out.

His greatest concern must be to pick his target well so that his act may speak so clearly for itself that no member of White America can mistake its message. If you can’t do it, leave it alone. Forget it! Don’t try and talk someone else into doing it and ESPECIALLY don’t hear of anyone else trying to talk YOU into anything. Don’t talk, period! However it can’t hurt to begin now to learn, to train, and to have materials ready.

True enough, it is hard to mistake the motive of a shooter in a black church, synagogue, or mosque. When you get caught and leave a manifesto behind, the message is most certainly loud and clear.

However, these fedposting idiots are breaking the third rule of Siege Club, and trying to con you into breaking the fourth.

Moreover, just because you sent a message, doesn’t mean you succeeded.

What must our definition of victory now become? To have survived another day, another year. To exist in and amongst the System… but not as a consumer, not as a statistic or as a victim. To exist decently and, to be sure, to “keep the wolves away from the door”.

We will LIVE. We will out-live the System. And, should we individually not make it all the way, then we will not have been cheated for we will have had our share. Living within the Beast System as a revolutionary, day-today, is the REAL emergency and it calls for emergency measures to be taken on a ROUTINE BASIS. To be able to exist thus is the victory!

Achieving sainthood through suicide missions, is thus not born of the doctrine these evangelists purport to espouse.

They are frauds, and I will be all too happy to see them shut down by the government.

But what of actual violence? If not suicide missions in mosques and synagogues, what sort of violence might one find justification for in Siege?

Rather, go instead to activities designed and intended to HURT THE ENEMY. And for these activities, in my own opinion, two participants are one too many. Also in my humble opinion it is a ridiculous risk and waste to mess with the material body of the Enemy, as he has all our tax money to mend himself, just as a lizard will grow a new limb. The PHYSICAL BODY of the Enemy however is so utterly flabby that he positively CAN’T STAND very much of an intensified assault of this kind. In short it would seem to me that any intelligence at all would lead comrades to know to stop hitting the Enemy where he laughs and start hitting him where he SCREAMS!

Strike hard and strike deep to build the climate for revolution where even the most craven of White cowards will be COMPELLED to join in or else die! But, for God’s sake, stop wasting yourselves and your efforts and making the rest of us look like damned idiots!

Anybody who thinks the enemy feels hurt when a bunch of Muslims in New Zealand end up dead, is a moron. Anybody who thinks Roof’s 9 nigger victims were in any way missed, is even dumber. The whole point of these people is that they are disposable.

A handful of Jews at a fag bris are no more missed, and you better believe that rabbi who got his thumb fucked up was happy to endure the injury. Communism always brings pogroms, and the people who push this shit are entirely too happy to make this expenditure of their coethnics’ lives.

By this standard, likewise misguided are ideas sometimes espoused by the propertarians, of disrupting infrastructure. An enemy who can compel you to pay the repair bill, does not care what you break.

It is exceedingly dangerous to start talking about target acquisition, and I do not want to encourage anyone to actually carry out such a task. In brief, somebody who is willing to risk their life is capable of doing very real damage to real people who actually matter. Gunning down disposals is retarded, and if you engage in violence that does not change political outcomes, then you are acting like a nigger gang banger, not a revolutionary.

Actually, you are acting worse than a nigger gang banger, because a nigger gang banger can kill one of his homeboys and be out in a few years. James Fields accidentally killed one fat girl while fleeing from an armed communist, and he only avoided the needle by pleading guilty and spending the rest of his life in prison.

Effective political violence would benefit the political forces which are most, even if not completely, in line with your ideas, by diminishing the power, inertia, and motivation, of their rivals. In our case, that would be to strengthen the Republican Party, and specific factions thereof, at the expense of the neocons and the Democrats. James Hodgkinson knew this, which is why he opened fire on the Freedom Caucus in Alexandria, Virginia. We are all very fortunate that he was poorly trained, because killing Steve Scalise and Rand Paul would definitely have altered the balance of power in Washington. Antifa knows this, which is why they go after Tucker Carlson and Ted Cruz.

In contrast, the fedposters are universally hostile to the entirety of the GOP, and Donald Trump in particular. What political outcome does that benefit? They would tell you the goal is to crash the system, but the outcome of their course is too predictable to believe the presentation. Trump’s enemies within the GOP are willing to make common cause with the Democrats to the extent it prevents the shifting of the Overton Window in our direction. Mass shootings and other shocking acts of violence attributed to us undeniably help the Democrat Party,

When was the last time you saw Antifa attack Elizabeth warren for not being hard core enough?

Never.

One set of equations that Joe Tommasi never got around to mentioning regarding the levels of the struggle is this: in the past the Right Wing pulled stupid stunts against Blacks and other useless expendables and then ran away hoping not to be caught later by Big Brother but usually were caught, and then offered no RESISTANCE. (Trying to defend yourself in Big Brother’s courtrooms is not resistance.) Lately some of the Movement have been choosing better, higher targets but still put themselves in a runaway kind of position where they are either caught right on the spot or after a manhunt. Again, little or no resistance (except in the heroic case of Fred Cowan who would not be taken). The two levels which the Movement is steadily evolving toward are these: first, if they must put themselves in a hit-and-run position then they will have made up their minds at the start to not surrender by the rules of the System’s game. The final level is when they have begun to hit and keep on hitting, never considering detection much less capture because they are completely involved with the ongoing attack. This final level of struggle shall be when the so-called ‘capture parties’ sent by Big Brother go out but don’t come back.

Later, Mason thought better of the “Hit and Run” strategy;

One of the areas is that of the overtly illegal, violent attacks against the System. “Hit and run”, so to speak. Wouldn’t it make better sense to turn that concept around to “run and hit”? It only means that you should first drop out of sight, go underground, and stay that way for however long is required for you to learn to exist comfortably at it. At that point you can go ahead and do – and probably get away with – any damned thing you’d choose to pull.

Striking in hot passion and then running blindly is no more than glorified suicide.

If you want your suicide to be glorified, then hang out with fedposters.

Come with me if you want to live.

In 1973, through constant activity nationwide and through some admirable policies of professionalism, the Movement stood ready to break into what Commander Rockwell would have called “Phase Three”, or the phase of mass action. We then had more leaders than had been on the scene in 1966. Rather than wait for a moment to come, we made our own. Not only that but we also chose the place: Cleveland. Over one hundred uniformed, helmeted Troopers marched down the middle of Euclid Avenue that Labor Day and formed-up in a public square for a rally. And though the opposition was there – from the System and from the Reds – we were too strong. Had that sort of show of strength and discipline been maintained and repeated in various other cities it most likely would have, first, broken the “spell” of thousands who were hovering on the brink of committing openly and, second, prompted panic reactions on the part of every aspect of our racial Enemy thus providing obvious and inescapable openings for further and greater EXPLOITATION.

Replace Commander Rockwell in this excerpt with your choice of prominent figure involved in the Unite The Right Rally. Replace Euclid Avenue in Cleveland, with the UVA Campus on August 11th, and to a lesser extent, Lee Park on August 12th.

Had that sort of show of strength and discipline been maintained and repeated in various other cities, we would be in a far better place today. As it turns out, there were men who were willing to do just that. Among them, Matt Heimbach and the Traditionalist Worker Party.

Back to Siege.

What set in next, both in 1966 and 1973, is what we must now learn to recognize and make our new effort far less vulnerable – if not altogether immune – to. There seemed to be no absolute commitment to REVOLUTION. No one seemed to know what the goal really was. The prevailing leadership at both times used the term “White Revolution” copiously in their propaganda but they thought only in terms of a revolutionary ideal or of a revolutionary social change far down the road somewhere. They did not fully subscribe to TOTAL REVOLUTION NOW! And not only the men at the very top. The one-man show has proved it can’t get to first base. To be legitimate, a revolutionary political movement must have at least about a dozen or more leading, prominent figures. No one among the cadres being built at those times (with the single outstanding exception of Joseph Tommasi) was thinking purely revolutionary. 

While Matt’s own personal failings sealed his fate, that was not, as those who have followed along will recall, the entirety of the story. After Spencer’s speaking event at Michigan State University, at which the TWP showed unrivaled courage in the face of an armed enemy who outnumbered them substantially, Weev’s blog descended upon the TWP with a campaign of calumny and humiliation which should have told us right then that there was a Jew behind it all.

That was pretty much the end of Alt Right street action, and the Reds rejoiced. As did Weev.

With the Alt Right off the streets, it was once again an Internet based phenomenon, and as such, solidly in Weev’s domain.

Did things improve, as we were promised, once the TWP disbanded, and left Spencer defenseless? The communists certainly would see it that way, but our movement has not fared well since then at all.

Did the attacks stop? Of course not. With Heimbach out of the way, it was on to destroy Paul Nehlen. Once he was driven completely insane and thoroughly discredited, it was my turn on the chopping block. Then it was on to Patrick Little. Now they have set their sights on TRS.

If, as Mason suggests, a movement must have a dozen or more leading, prominent figures, then the people who are making that impossible through calumny and humiliation of everybody who dares to poke their head out, are definitely not working toward anything described by James Mason.

Back to Siege

Had everyone concerned been completely committed to REVOLUTION OVER THE SYSTEM then it would have been a much easier task to sublimate the personal feelings and weaknesses which destroyed their efforts ultimately. The most incompatible of personalities can work together effectively for revolution but hardly for a damned thing else. The most limited and klutzy individual can understand the common sacred drive to SMASH THE SYSTEM. Everyone can find his or her proper place in the WAR AGAINST THE ESTABLISHMENT. The Communists have proven this in a dozen historic cases, all of them recent.

While I don’t quite share in Mr. Mason’s ill-defined target acquisition, or even the goal of revolution per se, we can here too draw an important parallel. The Alt Right was united in purpose, first behind the deification and election of Donald Trump. Next, we were united in purpose behind the goal of earning our Right to show our faces in public. To this end, those who were serious, sublimated our personal feelings and weaknesses, so that the most incompatible of personalities could and did work together effectively toward our common purpose. Men who actually went to jail, myself included, handled the stress of this better than people who are hiding in foreign countries, with Bitcoin to spare.

What we have seen since then, is a decidedly counter revolutionary force at work, in the most unflattering sense of that term. They have systematically sought out, identified, and piled on, every real and imagined personal and factional conflict among us. They have engaged in non-stop wholesale character assassination of every leading figure of this movement with the slightest chance of making it a real world force, and always, invariably, with the driving narrative that all hope is lost, and that our only hope is for young men to end their lives on the most unhelpful and self destructive sort of violent crime imaginable.

If the Department of Homeland Security targets them, you and I will be in a much better place.

Now, one who was foolish and unfortunate enough to get suckered into this scam, might read what I am saying and raise a predictable objection. “Ah Ha! Gotcha Cantwell! My masked fedposting leaders are the true revolutionaries, and the only reason they are working to ruin everything the movement has built up in the last five years is because you are the ones not dedicated to the revolution!

“Well,” comes the reply, “how are you so certain of this?”

Let us pretend for a moment that I were hell bent on the violent overthrow of the government of the United States, and the entirety of the Jew World Order with it. As it turns out, there is ample cause for the casual observer to believe this, actually. Lots of people, wrongly, do. Suppose I were as black pilled as my masked detractors, and with each Jewish senior citizen grazed by a talentless shooter’s bullet in a synagogue, I celebrated internally, waiting for the next comrade of ours to join the shooter in the enemy’s cages.

Given my notoriety, legal entanglements, and financial troubles, how might I handle this?

Well, I’d try to change that situation however I could.

To hear the fedposters tell it, I should throw my body upon the gears of the Machine. I should get back to doing Live from Seg for the next 20 years, or however long it takes Jared Howe to join me in the box.

Well, first of all. Fuck that. I already bled and went to jail for this thing. I gave up a job in broadcast radio, because I wouldn’t apologize for a “racist” remark. I gave up my social media presence, my PayPal account, all of my advertising contracts, and more than one hot potential wife. All because I take what we are doing that seriously. That means I’ve done more than almost anyone in this movement, and certainly more than any self styled revolutionary masked shithead, whose greatest fear is somebody might find out where he sleeps at night.

Even if everything I said from now until the end of time was complete horseshit, a true revolutionary would be deifying me as an example of self sacrifice and dedication to the cause. My errors would be paved over and minimized, and my virtues held in high praise, so as to encourage others to emulate my best behaviors.

The people who attack me are attacking everyone else who might contemplate putting anything meaningful at risk for this cause, and if they aren’t doing so themselves, they are at least connected to an effort by others to do so. They are making certain that no sane observer would, knowing that there will be the exact opposite of reward waiting for him on the other side.

They are fools at best, enemies at the far more likely worst, and escalating conflicts against a government as powerful as the United States is a losing proposal even for other governments throughout the world. A movement such as ours, which has been chased from the streets and bankrupted by some wealthy Jews and their lowlife masked anarchist pets, is by any measure weaker than a foreign government, and is thus in no shape to make such a powerful enemy.

We cannot win if we are dead or in prison, and even if you are very good at hiding your identity, the proliferation of the type of propaganda which is likely to cause a guy legal problems, is dangerous to our goals because it is simply unfit for public consumption. Guys start praising mass shooters, even as a joke, and then some other person who is less cautious ends up in jail for a reckless social media post. Or worse, some unhinged person stumbles across it, jumps the gun, and everything we care about ends up targeted by the full horrifying powers of the State.

Our interests are best served by being in alignment with the Trump wing of the Republican Party. Movement leaders need room to operate, to pivot rhetorically, and to earn a living. If the government wants to target us, we need to convince those targeting us that we are not their problem, and lead them in a direction more likely to secure the peace and prosperity of the country.

Anything short of that is a suicide mission, and we all ought question the motives of anybody who says otherwise.

 

There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632

Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!

Follow Chris on Telegram or Parler or Minds. The Jews banned me from everything else.

Podcast RSS FeedSubscribe via Email

Today we will have live streaming video courtesy of JoshWhoTV. Subscribe to our JoshWho Channel here and watch live on JoshWhoTV.

You can listen live on the Radical Agendas Radio Network. Catch video on demand on our Bitchute channel!

Continue reading

Outlaw Conservative S01E036 – Best Of The Outlaw Conservative Volume 1

I had a guest scheduled for today, who canceled on me just before midnight last night. I began to prepare for today’s show by talking about the recent dust up with Joe Biden and his son’s dealings in Ukraine, but the news is simply breaking too fast for me to form meaningful commentary on it before showtime.

So instead, I provide for your listening enjoyment, a collection of our greatest hits so far on the show, and we will be back for a live production next Wednesday.